cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Although the new definition is deeper and more inclusive, I think it is much less approachable especially to an less technical audience. The "container packaged, dynamically managed, micro service

By Bob Wise · #1552 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding)

By Junghyun Kim <kjh@...> · #1551 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Date: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 8:50 AM To: "cncf-toc@..."

By Mark Peek · #1550 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 binding

By Jonathan Boulle <jon@...> · #1549 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Hi Brian, Thank you. This is very timely with some of the efforts that are underway with the CNCF website. We intend to have a high level messaging on several use cases and applications. Regards, Dee

By Dee Kumar <dkumar@...> · #1548 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Yes I do. Paul

By Paul Fremantle <paul@...> · #1547 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Or "automatable": http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/09/cloud-native-application-interfaces.html Good suggestion. I agree they aren't all necessary in every situation. They are intended to serve as

By Brian Grant · #1546 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Paul Do you agree that mesh is helpful, but otherwise neither necessary nor sufficient? A

By alexis richardson · #1545 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I think the overall definition is much better. I really like how service meshes enable DRY and declarative intent, but there are lots of other important technologies (such as network attached

By Paul Fremantle <paul@...> · #1544 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Nice one Brian Once you said "cloud native is automation" Re the second section, I suggest "promote... but are not necessary for". In particular i am not convinced immutability is quite "right", and

By alexis richardson · #1543 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I converted this to a gdoc for easier editing/commenting for now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d9Ks3UvUV8sZj4ribAMwmq0MZwi1CwnOZWGtrCufOuk/edit?usp=sharing Thanks Brian for spearheading this

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1542 ·

updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

The CNCF Charter contains a definition of "Cloud Native" that was very Kubernetes-focused. This definition proved to be inadequate during a number of recent discussions, particularly those around

By Brian Grant · #1541 ·

Re: Agenda for upcoming CNCF meetings in Feb 2018

Thanks. I have a couple slides in the deck already, I may update them a bit before the meeting.

By John Belamaric · #1540 ·

Re: Agenda for upcoming CNCF meetings in Feb 2018

John, yes, we can definitely cover that.

By alexis richardson · #1539 ·

Re: Agenda for upcoming CNCF meetings in Feb 2018

Hi Alexis, We planned to have the annual inception review for CoreDNS at the Feb 6 meeting. Is there still space on the agenda for that? Thanks, John

By John Belamaric · #1538 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

Many of these companies have talked to us, and we are still in some form of conversation with some of them. The logos we've listed are only those from whom we've received explicit permission from. PS:

By Sugu Sougoumarane · #1537 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

FWIW, it looks like there is decent demand for something like Vitess (13790 commits) based on the number of companies that have implemented their own solutions: Tumblr: jetpants (1335

By Brian Grant · #1536 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 Binding

By Ken Owens · #1535 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

There's even Minecraft on Vitess :-) https://minecraftly.readme.io/v1.0/docs/what-is-minecraftly-universe

By Brian Grant · #1534 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

To follow up on this, with some links for external confirmation: I think some of the confusion arose due to data being sampled at different times. The original presentation to the TOC was last April,

By Brian Grant · #1533 ·

6461 - 6480 of 8012

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms