|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Hi guys,
I'm an engineer at HubSpot who was part of the decision to adopt vitess over a year ago and have contributed to the project both internally and externally. In that time we have committed
Hi guys,
I'm an engineer at HubSpot who was part of the decision to adopt vitess over a year ago and have contributed to the project both internally and externally. In that time we have committed
|
By
Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudreault@...>
·
#1530
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Ah, I should have made this explicit in our slides, but here is the information to address your concerns about the graduation criteria:
The following eight companies have vitess serving production
Ah, I should have made this explicit in our slides, but here is the information to address your concerns about the graduation criteria:
The following eight companies have vitess serving production
|
By
Sugu Sougoumarane
·
#1529
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
I share Camille’s concern.
Note that the only explicit requirement in this regard w.r.t. Incubation level is as follows (from https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/):
Document that it is
I share Camille’s concern.
Note that the only explicit requirement in this regard w.r.t. Incubation level is as follows (from https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/):
Document that it is
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1528
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Basically, I'm concerned that there are not really actual production users who also are project committers that aren't YouTube/Google.
Basically, I'm concerned that there are not really actual production users who also are project committers that aren't YouTube/Google.
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1527
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
But it is not yet in prod? Bringing it to prod sounds like not.
But it is not yet in prod? Bringing it to prod sounds like not.
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1526
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Just got this confirmation from Hubspot: "Definitely using. Two dedicated full timers working on bringing it to prod. Three others supporting part time, plus me. We have a handful of prod clusters at
Just got this confirmation from Hubspot: "Definitely using. Two dedicated full timers working on bringing it to prod. Three others supporting part time, plus me. We have a handful of prod clusters at
|
By
Sugu Sougoumarane
·
#1525
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
I'm confused, is hubspot using or evaluating this product? The different slide decks seem to disagree.
I'm confused, is hubspot using or evaluating this product? The different slide decks seem to disagree.
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1524
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 (binding)
- Bryan
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#1523
·
|
|
[RESULT] rook project proposal ACCEPTED (inception)
Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that rook has been accepted into CNCF as an INCEPTION level project (sponsored by Ben Hindman): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
+1 TOC binding votes (6 / 9):
-
Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that rook has been accepted into CNCF as an INCEPTION level project (sponsored by Ben Hindman): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
+1 TOC binding votes (6 / 9):
-
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1522
·
|
|
Agenda for upcoming CNCF meetings in Feb 2018
Hi everyone
Thank-you for a very well attended and productive TOC call on Jan
16th. The next call is on Feb 6th, in eight days time. This is a
call for Agenda items from the TOC community. I
Hi everyone
Thank-you for a very well attended and productive TOC call on Jan
16th. The next call is on Feb 6th, in eight days time. This is a
call for Agenda items from the TOC community. I
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1521
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 (non-binding)
By
shlomi.noach@...
·
#1520
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
By
whereshallyoube@...
·
#1519
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
By
Chakri Nelluri
·
#1518
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
Trying again:
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#1517
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
Trying again:
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#1516
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
------------------
Nathan Xu
Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Chris Aniszczyk"<caniszczyk@...>;
Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2018 00:50
+1 non-binding
------------------
Nathan Xu
Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Chris Aniszczyk"<caniszczyk@...>;
Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2018 00:50
|
By
"Nathan Xu <nathan_xu@...>
·
#1515
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Michael Pawliszyn
·
#1514
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
By
Tony Hsu
·
#1513
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 binding
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1512
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Ashudeep Sharma
·
#1511
·
|