cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/81 It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1455 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 non binding

By Brandon DuRette · #1454 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 non-binding for me Best Regards, Shannon Williams shannon@... +1 650-521-6902

By Shannon Williams <shannon@...> · #1453 ·

[VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC. Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1452 ·

FYI: TOC Project Voting Queue

At the TOC meeting earlier this week, the TOC has decided to invite 4 projects for voting after a lengthy community due diligence period: rook: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57 vitess:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1451 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 non-binding for me, with +1 to Brian Grant on process

By Erin Boyd · #1450 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 from me, as well, but we need to talk about the desired process going forward

By Brian Grant · #1449 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Apologies, my vote is binding.

By Sam Lambert <samlambert@...> · #1448 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 non-binding.

By Sam Lambert <samlambert@...> · #1447 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Here is my +1 Vote

By alexis richardson · #1446 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc

By Brian Grant · #1445 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

+1 to keeping it - non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 |

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #1444 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors.

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #1443 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted? Best Duncan -- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chair, Advisory Board Phone: +44

By Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> · #1442 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project. - brandon

By brandon@... · #1441 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances. -William

By William Morgan · #1440 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Yes, this is simply "let's keep this project going" decision. It's in two steps because I'd like to queue up multiple projects to be reviewed to graduate/move to the next level in one TOC call. I'd

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1439 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

"Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to keep the project" decision?" agreed, Chris, what's your thinking here? <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #1438 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

In general, I'd like to link to devstats dashboards in these types of reviews, so we can see the trajectory. For

By Brian Grant · #1437 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Different projects make different design tradeoffs. Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable. This article explains the difference pretty

By Brian Grant · #1436 ·

6541 - 6560 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms