cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/PRINCIPLES.md#no-kingmakers--one-size-does-not-fit-all Istio currently

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1435 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Hi Chris, Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to

By Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> · #1434 ·

[VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1433 ·

Re: Project metadata & calendar

Good idea

By Brian Grant · #1432 ·

Project metadata & calendar

Chris, Dan, To Brian's comment - "I think there's an opportunity for help from TOC contributors with these types of reviews, to pre-review the information provided, ask questions about project health

By alexis richardson · #1431 ·

Re: Graduation review for Fluentd

The application specifically addressed the graduation criteria, which was helpful. I posted some links to some stats relating to project health and contributor diversity. The incubation criteria also

By Brian Grant · #1430 ·

TOC Agenda for Jan 16th 2018

First off, happy 2018! Second, here's the deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/5wBe3d We plan to cover the existing project proposals + deciding on calling for a vote for the ones that have received

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1429 ·

Re: light-4j project proposal

Thanks Chris for the quick reply. I have booked 30 minutes next Friday morning at 10 am and will have the github issue ready before then.

By stevehu@... · #1428 ·

Re: light-4j project proposal

Hey Steve, you can book a time with me to chat here about the project proposal process: calendly.com/caniszczyk I also recommend filing a GitHub issue about your project with more information:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1427 ·

light-4j project proposal

Hi, I am the author of light-4j which is a fast, lightweight and cloud native microservices framework built on top of Java 8 SE. I am considering to join CNCF and wondering if someone can be a sponsor

By stevehu@... · #1426 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

here is the doc https://docs.google.com/a/synadia.com/document/d/1s9wPNq_BvObnqxySR_ByaPCbs-Y1GB5tI7zoBvAF3nQ/edit?usp=sharing I would be grateful if people from this list could now consider it open

By alexis richardson · #1425 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

In the last message on the email thread on this in November it was mentioned that there were still some outstanding todo’s before the doc could be considered ready of due diligence review. Some of

By Quinton Hoole · #1424 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

no, you have to remove yourself.

By alexis richardson · #1423 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

maybe, nonetheless we are using a g/doc currently

By alexis richardson · #1422 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

Wouldn’t it be preferable to do the preparation of the proposal in a Google Doc, and then commence the actual due diligence exercise with a PR (the way most of the other proposals have worked)?

By Quinton Hoole · #1421 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

It's all in a Google Doc, we haven't made a pr yet. All, please email me for access

By alexis richardson · #1420 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

Hi Alexis I don’t see a PR for the NATS proposal? Is there one? Thanks Q From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: Alexis Richardson

By Quinton Hoole · #1419 ·

Re: RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

To add: Nats DD is going well, I now need a few more existing or new people who can help review the DD material please. <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #1418 ·

RFC: Project Due Diligence Backlog

Hey all, hope everyone is having a great 2018! The next TOC meeting will be in a week, on Jan 16th and we'll resume our usual schedule of meetings the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of the month. We have some

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1417 ·

Re: Graduation review for Fluentd

It's on queue to discuss at the next TOC meeting in terms of how we are going to handle the process. We also have some project proposals in flight that we are tackling. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1416 ·

6561 - 6580 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms