RE: process & incubation. Sorry to come in late.? My experience is that community may consider graduation from incubation as assured.? I agree that it's intended to be a "maybe" but

* Brian Grant via cncf-toc (cncf-toc@...) wrote: yes

If we're going to figure out the proposal process, we need a proposal to start with, IMO. This thread is merely an expression of interest in a proposal. We don't know whether the project is

-1 Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus

+1

That would be a bad outcome that should act as an incentive to exit Incubation positively. Factors like this mitigate in favour of keeping things simple. Eg we could set ourselves a goal of getting

I agree with the rationale and you captured it very accurately, thank you.

One thing that occurred to me: CNCF may invest significant resources in a project while it is in incubation. Are we ok with projects walking away after such investment?

From the discussion, it sounded like we should add a couple items to the proposal template: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc 1. A discussion of how the project

+1

This proposal is fine in itself, but just to round out the other points made in the discussion: it doesn't quite address the issue of how projects might deal with decisions made by the TOC

Mark Yes that would be implied: so full transfer isn't obligatory on entering Incubation. At least for now. In my view no project would exit Incubation if the project leads were opposed to

One thing this implies to me is we will not be transferring any project assets to the CNCF until the project exits incubation. Otherwise it would be harder to disentangle the project should either

Hi This was raised at the end of today's call. I attempted to provide a qualitative overview of this question in the presentation at the Linux Collaboration Summit. There is a link to the slides in

seems very reasonable. R

Today we had some verbal +1s for the following suggestion: 1. The time when becoming a CNCF Project is irrevocable is when a project is promoted from Incubation 2. Prior to this a project may choose

Unless anyone makes a strong case for holding off on this by Friday pm, I'll get a draft proposal shared here on the weekend

+1.

From today's TOC call, here's a current draft of how working groups would work. It would be great if people can comment on it so we can get to consensus by the next meeting, as there's a desire to

I think it's a solid choice. Would be a win for CNCF to have a second very credible project on board.