One thing that occurred to me: CNCF may invest significant resources in a project while it is in incubation. Are we ok with projects walking away after such investment?

From the discussion, it sounded like we should add a couple items to the proposal template: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc 1. A discussion of how the project

+1

This proposal is fine in itself, but just to round out the other points made in the discussion: it doesn't quite address the issue of how projects might deal with decisions made by the TOC

Mark Yes that would be implied: so full transfer isn't obligatory on entering Incubation. At least for now. In my view no project would exit Incubation if the project leads were opposed to

One thing this implies to me is we will not be transferring any project assets to the CNCF until the project exits incubation. Otherwise it would be harder to disentangle the project should either

Hi This was raised at the end of today's call. I attempted to provide a qualitative overview of this question in the presentation at the Linux Collaboration Summit. There is a link to the slides in

seems very reasonable. R

Today we had some verbal +1s for the following suggestion: 1. The time when becoming a CNCF Project is irrevocable is when a project is promoted from Incubation 2. Prior to this a project may choose

Unless anyone makes a strong case for holding off on this by Friday pm, I'll get a draft proposal shared here on the weekend

+1.

From today's TOC call, here's a current draft of how working groups would work. It would be great if people can comment on it so we can get to consensus by the next meeting, as there's a desire to

I think it's a solid choice. Would be a win for CNCF to have a second very credible project on board.

For those who aren't familiar with the project: https://prometheus.io/ -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

TOC, I'd love to see Prometheus present soon, so please LMK if that is a good or bad thing. alexis

Slides for today https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1GkwjatsWilsFTDE3Xoi8LsiyBVqe73ZXXIag6dUIgHA/edit?ts=570bf346#slide=id.g10d1ca9f06_0_22

I want to add the idea of setting up Working Groups within the TOC: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/3 There was discussion at CollabSummit to have the TOC formalize this so people can collaborate

Hi all Please email me if you have items for this week's TOC. I'm drafting an agenda, which currently will cover some of the following... 1. Quick readout from Tahoe 2. CTA - Project Proposals Please

all thanks for your patience during the two week "break" due to the Ljnux Summit etc. I'll publish an agenda early next week, so please LMK if you have anything you'd like to table. as a starting

Just a reminder to folks that tomorrow's TOC call is cancelled. We'll resume again the following week. Best, Sarah -- Sarah Saul Client Services Manager The Linux Foundation (M) 520-245-5185 Skype: