maybe we should have a whole 'nother 'scape for data

Dan Please could you revert to the last known good version? Alexis

I made the change at the last minute to deal with a spacing issue. I will revert it in the next version and restore CI/CD to the top layer. Apologies. -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...> Executive Director,

The TOC will have to fix this, by going back to the 0.92 structure, which was correct. And rebuilding from there.

That's very disappointing

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6.

Woah. How did CICD get moved? Wtf Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not. Dan, Chris, any ideas?

Would be good to add a section for service providers. Especially now, when we have the first batch of certified kubernetes service provides Pini -- Pini Reznik CTO T. +31 (0) 6 317 99 811 W.

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it. Thanks, C

+1, non-binding. Dustin Kirkland VP of Product Canonical, Ltd. @dustinkirkland <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

+1 -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

+1

+1 (non-binding) -- Naadir Jeewa Platform Lead The Scale Factory,

+1 Clint Kitson Technical Director {code} by Dell EMC CNCF Governing Board Member --- email: Clinton.Kitson@... mobile: "+1 424 645 4116" team: codeDellEMC.com twitter: "@clintkitson" github:

+1 (non-binding) -- http://blog.arungupta.me http://twitter.com/arungupta

+1 (non-binding)

+1! (non-binding) <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

+1

+1 (non-binding) sounds like an interesting project!

I'll close the vote early next week to give time for other TOC members to vote in and any other non-binding community votes. Thanks everyone for voting. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719