Re: TOC important - please vote; and no conference call this week
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
+1 on proposal
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:03 AM To: Solomon Hykes Cc: cncf-toc@... Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] TOC important - please vote; and no conference call this week
Here you go Solomon: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/2
You should be on the mailing list + github organization (look for an invite in the mail)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...> wrote: Hi all, I would love to vote but haven't received any messages from the list, I'm guessing that I haven't been added yet? All,
I just spoke with Chris A and we'd both like to cancel this week's TOC call please.
Because:
1. Our main task from last week isn't finished yet --- please do VOTE on the project proposal that Jon et al. drafted. Your +1 (or not) must be on the public CNCF TOC list... 2. I'm travelling during the call, as I return from vacation...
For next week, we need to:
1. Ramp up on "why CNCF?" for propective CNCF projects 2. Ramp up on "development process", with help from joining projects 3. Start on our list of projects...
In the TOC we set up informal working groups for each of these. One takeaway from last week's meeting in Tahoe was that many CNCF people want to help with 1&2, especially 1. Let's all make sure we are reaching out to them and to contacts in our wider community networks, to that end.
Chris A, Sarah N, Sarah S,
Do you want to share any other takeaways from Tahoe?
alexis
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: TOC important - please vote; and no conference call this week
Here you go Solomon: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/2 You should be on the mailing list + github organization (look for an invite in the mail)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...> wrote: Hi all, I would love to vote but haven't received any messages from the list, I'm guessing that I haven't been added yet? --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: TOC important - please vote; and no conference call this week
Solomon Hykes
Hi all, I would love to vote but haven't received any messages from the list, I'm guessing that I haven't been added yet?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Monday, April 4, 2016, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
TOC important - please vote; and no conference call this week
alexis richardson
All, I just spoke with Chris A and we'd both like to cancel this week's TOC call please. Because: 1. Our main task from last week isn't finished yet --- please do VOTE on the project proposal that Jon et al. drafted. Your +1 (or not) must be on the public CNCF TOC list... 2. I'm travelling during the call, as I return from vacation... For next week, we need to: 1. Ramp up on "why CNCF?" for propective CNCF projects 2. Ramp up on "development process", with help from joining projects 3. Start on our list of projects... In the TOC we set up informal working groups for each of these. One takeaway from last week's meeting in Tahoe was that many CNCF people want to help with 1&2, especially 1. Let's all make sure we are reaching out to them and to contacts in our wider community networks, to that end. Chris A, Sarah N, Sarah S, Do you want to share any other takeaways from Tahoe? alexis
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Important: RFC: Project Proposal Process v1.0
alexis richardson
Dear TOC members with votes, please speak out!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Boulle via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: RFC: Project Proposal Process v1.0
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
+1
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:06 PM Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: RFC: Project Proposal Process v1.0
alexis richardson
LGTM +1 for moving forward with this, and opening the doors to proposals, official like
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [cncf-marketing] my slides from Linux Collab Summit today
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
Perfect! Great job Alexis!
From: cncf-marketing-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-marketing-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Alexis Richardson via cncf-marketing
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:17 PM To: cncf-toc@...; cncf-marketing@...; cncf-gb@... Subject: [cncf-marketing] my slides from Linux Collab Summit today
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
my slides from Linux Collab Summit today
alexis richardson
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: RFC: Project Proposal Process v1.0
friendly ping here as I'd love to kick off a vote on this today. feel free to vote here on the mailing list with a "+1"
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [cncf-marketing] OSCON Open Container Day OCI/CNCF Panel
Benjamin Hindman
I'll be there and happy to join as a panelist.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarah Saul via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [cncf-marketing] OSCON Open Container Day OCI/CNCF Panel
Camille Fournier
I will already be down there speaking at Cultivate, so I may be able to do this if needed.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Sarah Saul via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
[cncf-marketing] OSCON Open Container Day OCI/CNCF Panel
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
FYI on Open Container Day. Would anyone from the TOC be able to attend this event and be willing to participate as a panelist? Diane is looking for someone by Monday so we'll need to move quickly. Thanks, Sarah ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Diane Mueller-Klingspor via cncf-marketing <cncf-marketing@...> Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM Subject: [cncf-marketing] OSCON Open Container Day OCI/CNCF Panel To: cncf-marketing@..., Douglas Nassaur <dn283x@...>, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> All, I'm organizing a panel for OSCON's Open Container Day and would like to have 1-2 CNCF TOC reps on the panel along with 1-2 reps from OCI. Chris Anisczyk has offered himself up already. I'd like to have a TOC rep as well. Can you all help me reach out to the TOC members to see who from the list below is coming to OSCON and willing to be a panelist? I haven't the emails for most of these folks and I'm not on the TOC's mailing list. The event is in Austin May 17th. Alexis R has already said, he not planning on coming to OSCON Here's the list:
CFP is now closed but here's the link.http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/cfp/454 Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat OpenShift @openshiftcommons We have more in Common than you know, learn more at http://commons.openshift.org _______________________________________________ cncf-marketing mailing list cncf-marketing@... https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-marketing Sarah Saul Client Services Manager The Linux Foundation (M) 520-245-5185 Skype: srsaul
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
RFC: Project Proposal Process v1.0
To follow up our discussion after the last TOC meeting, here's a version of what we discussed in the google document put into final GitHub form: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/add-proposal-process/process/project_proposals.adoc The pull request is here: I went ahead and created the cncf-proposals@... mailing list: TOC members, please review the PR and provide any updates so we can finalize it on Monday with a vote. Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Interest in Intel Cluster Committee Meetings
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
Begin forwarded message:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Hardware Cluster for Open Source Testing/Dev
Dusty Mabe <dusty@...>
Hey Everyone,
In the meeting yesterday we discussed the hardware cluster donated by Intel. I believe there is a meeting next week that is focused on this topic. Can you share the details of that meeting? If the information is not public then feel free to email me directly. Thanks, Dusty
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Slides/Notes: 3/23 TOC Meeting
Here you go: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10zp_sz3-ms6kR_xRDLc3IlDx-_MrYMjP1jBfBNz5j6o/edit?usp=sharing The meeting next week is cancelled since many people will be at CollabSummit (http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/collaboration-summit) or traveling. We will meet again the following week. Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [RESULT] Kubernetes Vote by TOC
alexis richardson
I recommend owning Google group admin too. It can be hard to admin a group when the existing admin vanishes.
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:39 Michael Dolan, <mdolan@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [RESULT] Kubernetes Vote by TOC
Michael Dolan <mdolan@...>
Sarah, for the social channels / github / domains we should have the LF accounts on those. We can connect you off-list to the right people.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
---
Mike Dolan VP of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan mdolan@... ---
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Re: [RESULT] Kubernetes Vote by TOC
Sarah Novotny <sarahnovotny@...>
Ok... that's a very different scope than asset transfer. Most of those are simply adding additional admins or access and some (such as Google Groups) have distributed control in the community as opposed to any direct Google control. Who is getting added for these? They all require individuals to be given access. Twitter - @kubernetesio YouTube - Kubernetes Channel G+ - Kubernetes Page Blogger - blog.kubernetes.io Github Administration - github.com/kubernetes I'll chase these as part of the Copyright and Work Product transfer. Contributor List and copies of the CLAs Domains - kubernetes.io and k8s.io These don't feel like asset transfers because they're equally or more community controlled Google Groups -- numerous most have 1 community leader and 1 google employee as owners Meetup Groups -- numerous and most are lead from the community.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Correct
|
||||||||||||||
|