|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Cathy zhang
I will participate for Huawei and actively contribute to this effort. As I presented today, my key interest is consistent and portable user-facing configuration (event, function, event-function interaction/relationship) for its serverless workflow requirement .
Thanks, Cathy
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Kenneth Owens (kenowens) via cncf-toc
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:06 AM To: 'cncf-toc@...' Subject: [cncf-toc] Serverless WG formation
Today on the TOC call we discussed starting a Serverless workgroup and I agreed to chair said workgroup. There was no disagreement on the call but many TOC members were not present. Please respond with concerns or agreement.
Thanks,
Ken
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: prior docs about vitess
Sugu Sougoumarane
Vitess offers different transaction modes and isolation levels as described here: http://vitess.io/user-guide/twopc.html#isolation. The choice depends on what an application can tolerate. In case of the current Vitess community, users have rarely requested 2pc. They are usually satisfied with single-shard ACID transactions. The few that have requested 2PC are satisfied with the default isolation trade-offs.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote: This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Craig Peters <craig@...>
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:44 AM Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
-- Craig Peters | Director of Product Management | www.scalr.com m: +1 925 639 0804 e: craig@... | skype: craig.l.peters
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Thangavelu, Kapil
+1 (non-binding)
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 12:43:55 PM To: CNCF TOC Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation) The TOC has decided to invite CNI (https://github.com/containernetworking/) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Ken Owens from the TOC:
The CNI (Container Network Interface) project consists of a specification and libraries for writing plugins to configure network interfaces in Linux containers, along with a number of supported plugins. CNI concerns itself only with network connectivity of containers and removing allocated resources when the container is deleted. Because of this focus, CNI has a wide range of support (from Kubernetes, rkt, Mesos and more) and the specification is simple to implement (https://github.com/containernetworking/cni/blob/master/SPEC.md) Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/36 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Ihor Dvoretskyi
+1 (non-binding).
On May 16, 2017 9:44 PM, "Benjamin Hindman via cncf-toc" <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: prior docs about vitess
alexis richardson
This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
evolutions of each category X. If so then we can ask what properties of X are preserved. Atomicity and durability only?
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@google.com> wrote:
Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: prior docs about vitess
Brian Grant
Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition from MySQL to a more scalable implementation (scalable enough for Youtube), without taking so big a leap as NoSQL. Sugu confirmed that Vitess is getting interest from MySQL users. I could imagine also trying to find projects covering other categories, such as object storage and some flavor(s) of NoSQL. I view filesystems as a different category than these application-level storage systems.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote: The main doc:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Benjamin Hindman
+1!
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Chris Aniszczyk
a +1 here is sufficient for now Justin if you support the WG creation, here are the concrete goals for the proposed serverless WG atm:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Justin Garrison via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
I agree this would be a useful group in the cncf but also have concerns discussed in earlier calls about being too early on trying to standardize a solution and possibly limit an evolving technology too soon. Is there a google group I can subscribe to or should I just +1 here?
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Doug Davis via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Doug Davis <dug@...>
As I mentioned on the call, IBM as a key participant in Open Whisk will be there. -Doug Sent from my iPhone
On May 16, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Ying Huang
Hi Ken,
Very interested! Please add me in.
Thanks, Ying
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Sebastien Goasguen via cncf-toc
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:59 AM To: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> Cc: Antonio Gulli <gulli@...>; CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Serverless WG formation
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
-- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa
Run your favorite apps in the cloud with http://bitnami.com/cloud Confidential - All Rights Reserved. BitRock © 2017
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Sebastien Goasguen <sebgoa@...>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa Run your favorite apps in the cloud with http://bitnami.com/cloud Confidential - All Rights Reserved. BitRock © 2017
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
alexis richardson
Ken Can you solicit some oss projects to get involved? Is that doable? Please let us know! A
On Tue, 16 May 2017, 17:32 Antonio Gulli via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Jong Choi
From: Mark Coleman via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:06 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation) To: <cncf-toc@...>, Randy Abernethy <randy.abernethy@...> +1 non-binding On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 17:43, Randy Abernethy via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Antonio Gulli
thanks Ken, I'd like to participate as well for Google Cloud Function, with a particular interest for portable container environment, standard events, etc Cheers //A
--
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Soam Vasani
Thanks Ken, Chiming in for Fission.io -- I'd like
to participate too, and we're especially interested in function
portability across different serverless platforms, and standardization around event formats etc.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Kenneth Owens (kenowens) via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: Serverless WG formation
Lee Calcote
I agree and will participate.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As an aside, I consider our definition of "Cloud Native” being container-packaged, too limiting. - Lee
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Serverless WG formation
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
Today on the TOC call we discussed starting a Serverless workgroup and I agreed to chair said workgroup. There was no disagreement on the call but many TOC members were not present. Please respond with concerns or agreement.
Thanks,
Ken
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
+1 non-binding
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 17:43, Randy Abernethy via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Think
before you print.
Think
before you print.
Think
before you print.