1. cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io
  2. Messages
   Date   
Re: [VOTE] Cilium for incubation

Justin Cormack
 

+1 binding

Thanks to the team and customers for their help reviewing this project. I am excited for its future in the CNCF.

Justin


On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:04 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Cilium has applied to be included at the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/637
Due Diligence: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PlDiCA58nZEJGfWw32R-Y1cGI02ZUhQa6KG8ueSpef8/edit
Justin Cormack is the TOC sponsor for this project, has called for public comment and has approved a call for a public vote. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6063)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Re: [VOTE] Cilium for incubation

moh.ahmed@...
 

+1 non-binding

 

Moh Ahmed

Team Lead – Site Reliability Engineer

555 Legget Drive| Tower A | Suite 600| Ottawa ON | K2K 2X3 | 613-963-1200 (ext. 312) 

www.cengn.ca Follow us @CENGNCanada

 

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:04 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cilium for incubation

Cilium has applied to be included at the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/637
Due Diligence: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PlDiCA58nZEJGfWw32R-Y1cGI02ZUhQa6KG8ueSpef8/edit
Justin Cormack is the TOC sponsor for this project, has called for public comment and has approved a call for a public vote. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6063)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
[VOTE] Cilium for incubation

Amye Scavarda Perrin
 

Cilium has applied to be included at the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/637
Due Diligence: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PlDiCA58nZEJGfWw32R-Y1cGI02ZUhQa6KG8ueSpef8/edit
Justin Cormack is the TOC sponsor for this project, has called for public comment and has approved a call for a public vote. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6063)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Sandbox Review Meeting has moved to September 14th

Amye Scavarda Perrin
 

Hi all, 
We're moving the sandbox review meeting to September 14th. 
The Public TOC Meeting Working Document has the updated schedule.

Thanks! 

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Re: [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

Alena Prokharchyk
 

+1 binding

-alena

On Jul 29, 2021, at 12:28 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

Crossplane has applied for incubation status.

PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/620

Lei Zhang and Ricardo Rocha are the TOC sponsors for this project, have called for public comment and have approved a call for a public vote. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6013)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Re: [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

Sheng Liang <sheng.liang@...>
 

+1 binding

 

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 12:28 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

 

Crossplane has applied for incubation status.

PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/620


Lei Zhang and Ricardo Rocha are the TOC sponsors for this project, have called for public comment and have approved a call for a public vote. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6013)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Cartografos Working Group maturity model documentation committed to GitHub

Simon Forster
 

Dear All,

 

As you may be aware, the Cartografos Working Group commenced work on a Cloud Native Maturity Model. Our initial effort focused on preparing documentation on the four key areas of People, Process, Policy and Technology. We also produced a Prologue that introduces the model and outlines the five levels of Build, Operate, Scale, Improve, and Optimize.

 

We wish to inform you that we have committed the five documents to our repository on GitHub and we invite the community to submit issues and pull requests.

https://github.com/cncf/cartografos#cloud-native-maturity-model-reference-documents

 

Our next step for the model is to add supplementary material to GitHub, and we expect to commence work with TAGs and Projects within the CNCF to ensure ongoing effective representation of projects within the model over time. We anticipate the model will evolve quickly, and we hope that it becomes a very useful tool for end users, as well as community members and contributors.

 

As well as working with the Business Value Subcommittee to produce the CNCF Landscape Guide, we are also collaborating with the CNCF on a surprise for KubeCon and CloudNativeCon NA in October.

 

We wish to thank the TOC for feedback we have received, it has been immensely useful, and we hope to work with you on an ongoing basis on this contribution to the cloud native community.

 

Regards,

 

The Cartografos Working Group

 

Danielle Cook, Fairwinds

John Forman, Accenture

Robert Glenn, Accenture

Simon Forster, Stackegy
Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Bing Lien
 

+1 b

從我的iPhone傳送
Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Paul Buck
 


+1 NB

Paul Buck

VP Community Development | Eclipse Foundation

+1.613.220.6507

Register for our virtual event: EclipseCon 2021 - October 25-28, 2021



On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:22 AM Dave Zolotusky via lists.cncf.io <dzolo=spotify.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 6:28 PM Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io <justin.cormack=docker.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.

Thanks to everyone for all the hard work on the project.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:50 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.  https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md has details but what this means:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...



--
~Dave
Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Dave Zolotusky
 

+1 binding

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 6:28 PM Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io <justin.cormack=docker.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.

Thanks to everyone for all the hard work on the project.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:50 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.  https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md has details but what this means:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...



--
~Dave
Re: [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

Liz Rice
 

+1 binding

(Thanks to everyone involved in pulling together the due diligence doc!)

On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 14:40, Cornelia Davis <cornelia@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 5:44 AM onneman <heiko.onnebrink@...> wrote:
+1 NB

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Justin Cormack
 

+1 binding.

Thanks to everyone for all the hard work on the project.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:50 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.  https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md has details but what this means:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Re: [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

Cornelia Davis
 

+1 binding

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 5:44 AM onneman <heiko.onnebrink@...> wrote:
+1 NB

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Cornelia Davis
 

+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:02 PM Lei Zhang <resouer@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:32 PM Ricardo Rocha <ricardo.rocha@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 07:49:29PM +0100, Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 18:15, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
>
> > +1 NB
> >
> > Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 18:50 Amye Scavarda Perrin <
> > ascavarda@...> wrote:
> >
> >> Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was
> >> always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that
> >> OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an
> >> archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.
> >> https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.
> >>
> >> Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be
> >> archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md
> >> has details but what this means:
> >>
> >>
> >> - CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
> >> - CNCF will list archived projects online
> >> - Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted
> >> neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
> >> - CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help
> >> transition users.
> >> - Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the
> >> project (like space at conferences)
> >>
> >> Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
> >>
> >> Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate
> >> non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>





Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Reitbauer, Alois
 

+1 NB


On 20.08.2021, at 19:19, Richard Hartmann via lists.cncf.io <richih=richih.org@...> wrote:


+1 NB

Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 18:50 Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.  https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md has details but what this means:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

This email may contain confidential information. If it appears this message was sent to you by mistake, please let us know of the error. In this case, we also ask that you do not further forward the content and delete it. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. Dynatrace Austria GmbH (registration number FN 91482h) is a company registered in Linz whose registered office is at 4020 Linz, Austria, Am Fünfundzwanziger Turm 20.

Re: [VOTE] Crossplane for incubation

Heiko Onnebrink
 

+1 NB
Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Lei Zhang
 

+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:32 PM Ricardo Rocha <ricardo.rocha@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 07:49:29PM +0100, Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 18:15, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
>
> > +1 NB
> >
> > Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 18:50 Amye Scavarda Perrin <
> > ascavarda@...> wrote:
> >
> >> Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was
> >> always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that
> >> OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an
> >> archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.
> >> https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.
> >>
> >> Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be
> >> archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md
> >> has details but what this means:
> >>
> >>
> >> - CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
> >> - CNCF will list archived projects online
> >> - Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted
> >> neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
> >> - CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help
> >> transition users.
> >> - Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the
> >> project (like space at conferences)
> >>
> >> Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.
> >>
> >> Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate
> >> non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>





Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Ricardo Rocha
 

+1 binding

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 07:49:29PM +0100, Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io wrote:
+1 binding

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 18:15, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:

+1 NB

Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, 18:50 Amye Scavarda Perrin <
ascavarda@...> wrote:

Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was
always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that
OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an
archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal.

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be
archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md
has details but what this means:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted
neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help
transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the
project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate
non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...




?
signature.asc

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Erin Boyd <erin_boyd@...>
 

+1 binding

On Aug 20, 2021, at 1:47 PM, Romain DARY <romain.dary@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding 

Romain Dary

On 20 Aug 2021, at 21:01, Juraci Paixão Kröhling <jpkroehling@...> wrote:


+1 non-binding. OpenTracing was a great project and contributed a lot to democratize distributed tracing, which is reflected in its evolution as OpenTelemetry.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:53 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Since the merger of OpenTracing & OpenCensus into OpenTelemetry it was always the maintainers’ intention to archive OpenTracing. Now that OpenTelemetry has reached incubation, OpenTracing is proposed as an archived project as the previous iteration of OpenTelemetry.  https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/710 is the proposal. 

Archiving a project is rare, this is only the 2nd CNCF project to be archived. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md has details but what this means: 


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

-- 
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
Re: [VOTE] Proposal to archive OpenTracing

Alolita Sharma
 

+1 NB

-Alolita
1781 - 1800 of 7939