|
Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets
Arvind Gupta
I would recommend setting up a URL forwarding from old repos to new repos, so that charts are maintained at new locations but old URL references continue to work. Thanks, -Arvind
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
[URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets
Saad Ali
TOC Folks, I want to bring https://github.com/helm/community/issues/114 to your attention. This has the potential for causing a lot of pain to users. The buckets are scheduled to be deleted on Nov 13, 2020, per the original deprecation plan. As that date is fast approaching, it is becoming clear that doing so could cause major issues. Per Brian's comment on the bug "The usage of the charts storage buckets hasn't decreased at all. It's higher than when the deprecation was announced last October. There have been about 3.5 accesses per second on average over the last 12 hours." The Helm project has been trying very hard to get the word out, migrating what they can, and pointing people to chartcenter.io (which has copies of both incubator and stable as an alternative). But the hard part to fight is the countless posts/examples on stackoverflow/other sites, and the many vendors who apparently haven't migrated yet. Given that and the bucket usage metrics, the fear is that the number of people still using the old repos may be under-estimated, and shutting down the buckets could cause many unanticipated outages. The long lead time was supposed to be about getting users off, but that result does not appear to be achieved yet. As TOC, should we consider alternative options such as transitioning ownership of these resources to CNCF to ensure a longer runway for deprecation? Regards, Saad Ali
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
+1 binding
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:18 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
--
~Dave
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cloud native "reference/demo" application
Reitbauer, Alois
I am using this list as it most likely reaches the widest audience in the CNCF.
In recent discussions in the app delivery SIG we came to the conclusion that a reference application would make sense that a) has most of the characteristics of real world applications b) can be used to demonstrate good practices and also how certain CNCF tools can be used to solve common problems.
Having a reference application – or multiple - when we are talking about app delivery makes a lot of sense.
Looking at the most widely used applications you undoubtedly end up with Hipstershop, Sockshop or one of their variants. While these apps are nice to demo what a cloud-native application can look like, they also miss key characteristics like stateful workloads, third party integrations, secrets, multi-stage configurations, databases, …. .
I also assume that many CNCF project have their own demo applications to demonstrate their capabilities.
Alexis made the proposal to fork one of more of the demo applications over in a CNCF demo-apps org. This, however, only makes sense if there is active development on this demo. It might be even better to have the demo app together with the development community behind actively participate in the CNCF – by e.g. donating the app as a sandbox project.
So, to get more concrete, a couple of questions to get feedback on:
Obviously, as this idea matures this need direction and discussion in the TOC. I am using this email to kick off the discussion and collect some first data points.
// Alois
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Andrés Vega
+1 NB.
As the lead reviewer for the upcoming sig-security assessment, the project appears to have done a fair amount of due diligence from a precursory look at the prepared draft. Andres
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Kevin Wang
+1 nb
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated
Archy k
+1 NB
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated
Jon Mittelhauser
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Sheng Liang via lists.cncf.io" <sheng=rancher.com@...>
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io" <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...>
+1 binding
-alena.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated
Sheng Liang
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io" <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...>
+1 binding
-alena.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Brendan Burns
+1, binding
--brendan
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Li, Xiang via lists.cncf.io <x.li=alibaba-inc.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 12:37:06 PM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>; chris@... <chris@...> Cc: Sheng Liang <sheng@...>; justin.cormack@... <justin.cormack@...>; Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>; CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated
+1 NB
Thanks & Regards, Siddharth Bhadri
Infoblox | Next Level Networking
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io" <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...>
+1 binding
-alena.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated
Alena Prokharchyk
+1 binding
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-alena.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Li, Xiang
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Adam FitzGerald
+1 non-binding Regards Adam
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Sheng Liang
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...>
+1 binding.
Thanks to all the people who helped me with due diligence for this project.
Justin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:18 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Justin Cormack
+1 binding. Thanks to all the people who helped me with due diligence for this project. Justin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:18 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
+1 nb
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 17:18 Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Gadi Naor
+1 NB
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:18 AM Joe Beda <jbeda@...> wrote:
--
Securing Kubernetes & Service Mesh. Anywhere. Bridging Security & DevOps.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Re: (CAUTION - EXTERNAL) [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation
Scott Fulton
+1NB 
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:24 PM Owens, Ken <ken.owens@...> wrote:
--
Scott Fulton Founder & CEO OpsCruise, Inc Sunnyvale, CA +1-916-204-4369 
|
|||||||||
|
|
