Date   

Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Gareth Rushgrove
 

+1, nb

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 18:32, Amye Scavarda Perrin
<ascavarda@...> wrote:

A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


--
Gareth Rushgrove
@garethr

devopsweekly.com
morethanseven.net
garethrushgrove.com


Re: [E] [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

mark.chilvers@...
 

+1, nb


Mark Chilvers

Associate Fellow
Cloud Engineering & Enablement



On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:32 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Randy Abernethy
 

+1 nb

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vittal@...>
 

0

“Application Delivery” is a term used to describe delivery of the application to the user of the application. See Gartner’s helpful definition: https://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/application-delivery-controller-adc  “…to optimize application performance, security and resource efficiency by offloading servers, providing deep payload inspection and making the best use of complex protocols”

This usage of “Application Delivery” confuses the matter. I wish it could be more precise. For example, “Application Packaging and Deployment”

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

 

A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Rein Remmel
 

+1, nb

On 28 Aug 2019, at 20:32, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Siddharth Bhadri
 

+1 nb

Regards,
Siddharth Bhadri

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 11:06 PM Radu M <root@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding

Radu M


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Radu M
 

+1 non-binding

Radu M


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Nicolas Trangez <nicolas.trangez@...>
 

+1, nb

Cheers,

Nicolas

On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 10:32 -0700, Amye Scavarda Perrin wrote:
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson
and
Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal
located
here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate
non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!


Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Stephen Augustus
 

+1 nb!


On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 13:32 Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


[VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG

Amye Scavarda Perrin
 

A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.

Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the future.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/281

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: ChubaoFS Project - SIG Storage Feedback

Alex Chircop
 

Apologies - I meant to type Project ChubaoFS not Longhorn in the previous email!

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Alex Chircop via Lists.Cncf.Io <alex.chircop=storageos.com@...>
Sent: 27 August 2019 18:00
To: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
Cc: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] ChubaoFS Project - SIG Storage Feedback
 
 I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had regarding the ChubaoFS project.

Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG call of 12th June.   Recording for the session is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0-cUTPcpaQ

The technical presentation is in the attached PDF.

Following the presentation, we had some followups and discussions and in general are happy to recommend the project for sandbox (following our call on Aug 14th).

The SIG has drafted a short survey/questionnaire to make sure we apply a consistent approach at collecting a common set of information during a project review.   This current questionnaire is geared towards a sandbox project review and should hold relevant information that the TOC will find useful when considering a project for sponsorship/review.   We also made sure the capture helpful IP Policy related info.

The info & questionnaire as completed by Wei is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Cnz3AHooqtml0xWhF6Hgei4gpWiRJbwoVCO_pN2z4c/edit 

We continue to refine our process, so any feedback or ideas of what we can do better is very welcome!

Let me/SIG know if you need more information or have any queries.

Kind Regards,
Alex


ChubaoFS Project - SIG Storage Feedback

Alex Chircop
 

 I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had regarding the ChubaoFS project.

Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG call of 12th June.   Recording for the session is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0-cUTPcpaQ

The technical presentation is in the attached PDF.

Following the presentation, we had some followups and discussions and in general are happy to recommend the project for sandbox (following our call on Aug 14th).

The SIG has drafted a short survey/questionnaire to make sure we apply a consistent approach at collecting a common set of information during a project review.   This current questionnaire is geared towards a sandbox project review and should hold relevant information that the TOC will find useful when considering a project for sponsorship/review.   We also made sure the capture helpful IP Policy related info.

The info & questionnaire as completed by Wei is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Cnz3AHooqtml0xWhF6Hgei4gpWiRJbwoVCO_pN2z4c/edit 

We continue to refine our process, so any feedback or ideas of what we can do better is very welcome!

Let me/SIG know if you need more information or have any queries.

Kind Regards,
Alex


Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps

Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...>
 

Indeed great :)

Now, I still wonder how we can proceed. I'm happy to bring this up on a TOC call again and discuss it there.

- fabian

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:10 PM Erin Boyd <eboyd@...> wrote:
Great! I am happy about that.

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:39 AM Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
The second one is better.  

The one thing that the TOC want to avoid is "lobbying" in which projects get pre-rolled.


On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:36 PM Erin Boyd <eboyd@...> wrote:
Alexis,
This has long been an open question on process for me.
Should we be addressing each TOC member individually or should the formal presentation server as the "request for sponsorship from the TOC."
I sort of lean towards the second one.
Thoughts?
Erin




On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:03 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Fabian

Have you asked all the TOC yet?

alexis


On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:58 PM Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...> wrote:
>
> Hola TOC and interested readers,
>
> a few weeks ago I've presented KubeVirt to you, with goal to find sponsors for KubeVirt submission to the CNCF Sandbox.
> Back then there was the ask about early adopters. By now a few adopters have spoken up on the relevant PR [0]
>
> - NTT: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-512618899
> - Loodse: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516525581
> - OSI: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516530085
> - SAP: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516746510
> - CloudFlare: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-520911273
> - NVIDIA: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-521116377
> - IBM: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-521864890
>
> And I'm optimistic that some more adopters will speak up over the next weeks.
>
> We were happy to see that Lic Rice from the TOC volunteered as a TOC sponsor. Now we are looking to find another sponsor in order to allow the project to enter the CNCF Sandbox.
>
> I'm available to answer any questions you might have - feel free to reach out to me on or off-list - or on the PR [0].
>
> Greetings
> - fabian
>
>
> ---
> [0] https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265
>





--

Erin A. Boyd

Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO

Red Hat

eboyd@...   



--

Erin A. Boyd

Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO

Red Hat

eboyd@...   


Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps

Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...>
 

Hey Alexis,

sorry - these emails somehow slipped my eyes.
No, I have not soke up to all of the TOC members yet, but a few who I thought would be interested in the topic.

- fabian


On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:03 PM Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Fabian

Have you asked all the TOC yet?

alexis


On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:58 PM Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...> wrote:
>
> Hola TOC and interested readers,
>
> a few weeks ago I've presented KubeVirt to you, with goal to find sponsors for KubeVirt submission to the CNCF Sandbox.
> Back then there was the ask about early adopters. By now a few adopters have spoken up on the relevant PR [0]
>
> - NTT: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-512618899
> - Loodse: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516525581
> - OSI: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516530085
> - SAP: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-516746510
> - CloudFlare: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-520911273
> - NVIDIA: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-521116377
> - IBM: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265#issuecomment-521864890
>
> And I'm optimistic that some more adopters will speak up over the next weeks.
>
> We were happy to see that Lic Rice from the TOC volunteered as a TOC sponsor. Now we are looking to find another sponsor in order to allow the project to enter the CNCF Sandbox.
>
> I'm available to answer any questions you might have - feel free to reach out to me on or off-list - or on the PR [0].
>
> Greetings
> - fabian
>
>
> ---
> [0] https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/265


Re: [cncf-sig-app-delivery] accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes

Reitbauer, Alois <alois.reitbauer@...>
 

Back to business today.

 

// Alois

 

From: <cncf-sig-app-delivery@...> on behalf of Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
Date: Tuesday, 13. August 2019 at 01:11
To: alexis richardson <alexis@...>
Cc: cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>, "cncf-sig-app-delivery@..." <cncf-sig-app-delivery@...>, Amye Scavarda <amye@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-sig-app-delivery] accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes

 

I'll be back from vacation Tue 13.

 

Q

 

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 12:43 alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Doh.  12th is Monday. 

 

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019, 15:56 Alexis Richardson, <alexis@...> wrote:

Hi all

Following a steer from Liz:

Michelle and I have agreed this schedule for getting to a vote on the
charter for CNCF App Delivery SIG.

12 Aug (Tuesday)
Close TOC / community comments on draft charter

12-14 Aug
Charter editors tidy up & create final version

14 Aug (next Wed)
App Del SIG votes
voting by email after F2F SIG call (@amye)

then:
TOC can vote on 20 Aug (Tuesday)
again, voting by email after TOC F2F call

-
alexis

The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Dynatrace Austria GmbH (registration number FN 91482h) is a company registered in Linz whose registered office is at 4040 Linz, Austria, Freistädterstraße 313


Proposed SIGs, September 3rd agenda item

Amye Scavarda Perrin
 

As we move forward on App Delivery, it's now time to review our other upcoming SIGs. 
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/sigs/proposed.md has a list (that will shortly not include App Delivery). 

Available SIGs:
- Traffic/Networking
- Observability
- Core and Applied Architectures 

Is there a group that wants to be added that isn't in this list? 
We'll ask on the September 3rd TOC call, so you have a few weeks. 

- amye 

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...


Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?

Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...>
 

Thank you! I missed it last time I looked (maybe I need new bifocals -LOL). 

aimee


Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?

Dan Kohn <dan@...>
 

It’s been done: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/

--
Dan Kohn <dan@...+1-415-233-1000
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io
dankohn.com or book on my calendar: dankohn.com/c

On Aug 21, 2019, at 09:29, Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:

Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and where will the list be located? 


Thanks!

Aimee Ukasick (aimeeu)
Kubernetes SIG Docs


Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?

Chris Aniszczyk
 


On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:29 AM Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:

Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and where will the list be located? 


Thanks!

Aimee Ukasick (aimeeu)
Kubernetes SIG Docs



--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?

Amye Scavarda Perrin
 

This is currently listed on the CNCF website: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/ 


On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:29 AM Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:

Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and where will the list be located? 


Thanks!

Aimee Ukasick (aimeeu)
Kubernetes SIG Docs



--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...

4141 - 4160 of 7697