1. cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io
  2. Messages
   Date   
Re: Anyone know what this is?

Quinton Hoole
 

Chris, can we put this on the agenda for the next TOC meeting please.

I'd like the TOC to have a clear understanding of what's happening with the Cloud-native Network Functions effort, as it's very unclear at the moment.  See also the thread below.

Thanks

Q

From: Dan Kohn [dan@...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 1:00 PM
To: Quinton Hoole
Cc: Chris Aniszczyk; Alexis Richardson
Subject: Re: CNFS Cloud-native Network Functions

That's a mistake, then. I will make clear the problem to them and ask them to get my signoff first on future submissions.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:53 PM Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
Thanks for clarifying Dan

There are several proposed Kubecon talks (e.g. for Barcelona in May) on Cloud-native Network Functions, some by CNCF-paid contractors, which do not portray it in that light.

Q

From: Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 04:32 
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...>, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>
Subject: Re: CNFS Cloud-native Network Functions

Here's background on CNFs. In short, it's a demonstration and marketing term for how to use Kubernetes as a substrate for the telco use case. There's no project associated with it, and a key consideration is how to support telcos without "breaking" Kubernetes's success for enterprise users. There are no actual upstream changes or new projects that we're proposing.


On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:16 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
+Dan Kohn 

The nomenclature is a bit off but this is a CNCF funded effort / demo, not an official CNCF project per se.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:47 AM Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
Hi Alexis, Chris

I recently noticed that CNFS claim to be “in the CNCF”.


I think this is the first I’ve heard of this.  Am I asleep at the wheel?  Was this ever passed by the TOC?  Where exactly does it fit in?

There is a CNFS project in the CNCF GitHub:


But it’s not listed as a sandbox (or any other) CNCF project?

What am I missing here?

Thanks for any guidance.

Q



-- 
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
From: cncf-toc@... [cncf-toc@...] on behalf of alexis richardson [alexis@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:09 AM
To: Dan Kohn
Cc: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc; Liz Rice
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Anyone know what this is?

If so then I assume this article is all a set of misquotes by the journalist:




On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, 15:58 Dan Kohn, <dan@...> wrote:
Definitely, there's a lot more to come. We're also hoping to get a bunch of telcos and their vendors engaged and making improvement to the Testbed so that it becomes a real, collaborative open source project.

--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation  https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000  https://www.dankohn.com
Re: Anyone know what this is?

alexis richardson
 

If so then I assume this article is all a set of misquotes by the journalist:




On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, 15:58 Dan Kohn, <dan@...> wrote:
Definitely, there's a lot more to come. We're also hoping to get a bunch of telcos and their vendors engaged and making improvement to the Testbed so that it becomes a real, collaborative open source project.

--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation  https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000  https://www.dankohn.com
[RESULT] containerd moving to graduation (PASSED)

Chris Aniszczyk
 

The vote for containerd moving to the graduation maturity level has been approved:

https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165
https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2019/02/28/cncf-announces-containerd-graduation/

+1 binding TOC votes (8/9):
Jeff: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2900
Joe: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2914
Matt: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2915
Xiang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2916
Brian: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2924
Brendan: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2931
Quinton: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2933
Alexis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2934

+1 non-binding community votes:
Ihor Dvoretskyi: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2874
Richard Hartmann: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2875
Phil Estes: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2876
Justin Cormack: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2877
Doug Davis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2878
Liz Rice: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2879
Davanum Srinivas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2880
Bob Killen: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2881
Sonya Koptyev: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2883
Yassine Tijani: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2884
Alex Chircop: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2885
Suresh Krishnan: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2886
Feilong Wang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2887
Randy Abernethy: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2889
郑淮城: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2890
Allen Sun: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2891
徐翔轩: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2894
Lee Calcote: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2895
Nick Chase: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2897
Christian Jantz: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2898
Xu Wang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2901
Dan Shaw: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2903
Haining Zhang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2906
Philippe Robin: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2911
Sebastiaan van Stijn: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2912
Ayrat Khayretdinov: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2913
Jia Zou: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2917
Heng Du: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2918
Abdul Aziz: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2921
Erin Boyd: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2926
Mark Peek: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2927
Justin Cappos: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2928
Gilbert Song: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2929
Dan Wilson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2930
Xing Yang: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2932
Pengfei Ni: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2935

0 non-binding community votes:
Chris Short: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2882
Ruben Orduz: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2893

Thanks all for voting!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
China Scale

Kevin Xu
 

Hi all,

  I recently wrote a piece on Software Engineering Daily on how the scale of China's internet economy is a great sandbox for battle-testing new technologies: https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2019/02/26/china-scale-the-new-sandbox-to-battle-test-innovative-technology/

  Alexis thought it's worthwhile that I share it here.

  Would appreciate your commentary and feedback, either here or offline (or twitter). Enjoy!

Kevin

--
Kevin S. Xu
General Manager of Global Strategy and Operations
PingCAP, the team behind TiDB, TiKV
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Pengfei Ni
 

+1 non-binding


Best regards.


---
Pengfei Ni



alexis richardson <alexis@...> 于2019年2月27日周三 下午5:52写道：

+1 binding


On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:42 AM Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
+1 (binding)
From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date:2019-02-18 08:59:35
Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

alexis richardson
 

+1 binding


On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:42 AM Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
+1 (binding)
From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date:2019-02-18 08:59:35
Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Quinton Hoole
 

+1 (binding)
From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date:2019-02-18 08:59:35
Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Xing Yang
 

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:59 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Brendan Burns
 

+1


From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 9:17 AM
To: Brendan Burns
Subject: Fwd: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation
 


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:59 AM
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>


containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Wilson, Dan <dan.wilson01@...>
 

+1 non-binding. woot, woot!

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

 

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Gilbert Song
 

+1 (non-binding).

-Gilbert

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:37 AM Justin Cappos <jcappos@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:23 PM Mark Peek via Lists.Cncf.Io <markpeek=vmware.com@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

 

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Justin Cappos
 

+1 non-binding

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:23 PM Mark Peek via Lists.Cncf.Io <markpeek=vmware.com@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

 

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Mark Peek
 

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

 

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Erin Boyd
 

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:59 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: Anyone know what this is?

Dan Kohn <dan@...>
 

Definitely, there's a lot more to come. We're also hoping to get a bunch of telcos and their vendors engaged and making improvement to the Testbed so that it becomes a real, collaborative open source project.

--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation  https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000  https://www.dankohn.com
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

Brian Grant
 

+1 binding

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria:

- Have a healthy number of committers and at least two from different organizations: Containerd has had a variety of maintainers and reviewers since its inception, and currently have 12 committers representing Docker, NTT, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla, and Cruise Automation. They also have reviewers representing Alibaba, ZTE, Huawei, Docker, Microsoft and an independent developer.

- Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users:

Containerd began life prior to its CNCF as a lower-layer runtime manager for the Docker engine. Continuing today, containerd has widest usage and adoption as the layer between the Docker engine and the OCI runc executor. However, as containerd and its CRI plugin project have merged in January 2018, the combined use of containerd and the CRI plugin has grown to include several public cloud providers, as well as several projects who are attracted to the simplicity of the Go client API library for embedding container runtime capabilities.

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service (IKS)
IBM Cloud Private (ICP)
Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine (GKE) [offers containerd in "alpha clusters"]
Cloud Foundry
Alibaba's PouchContainer
Rancher's Rio project
Eliot
Balena
LinuxKit
BuildKit
AWS Firecracker
Kata containers
Docker engine

- Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/graphs/contributors + https://containerd.devstats.cncf.io + https://all.devstats.cncf.io/d/54/project-health?orgId=1&var-repogroup_name=containerd

- Have achieved a CII badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/1271

- Define a governance model: https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: Anyone know what this is?

Lee Calcote
 

Of the major benefits highlighted, #3 - developer velocity (and the inherent increase in consistency of infrastructure configuration) - is not to be overshadowed by the the first major benefit of performance improvements. Each are substantial.

The goal of the CNF Testbed's apples-to-apples comparison resonates with the goal of the Meshery project with aims for apples-to-apples performance comparison between prominent service mesh projects. Meshery is an alpha state project slated for demo in an upcoming Networking WG call.

- Lee

On Feb 25, 2019, at 7:49 AM, Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:

Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:




--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
Re: Anyone know what this is?

Liz Rice
 

Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?


On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
Re: [VOTE] containerd moving to graduation

abdul aziz
 

+1 binding 

Md.Abdul  Aziz
BTech,CSE,IIIT -HYD



On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:34 AM heng du <duhengforever@...> wrote:
+1

jia zou <zoujia.steven@...> 于2019年2月25日周一 上午9:57写道：
+1 nb

Thanks & Regards,
---------------------------
Steven Zou/邹佳, Core maintainer of CNCF hosted project Harbor.

Skype: bear_douzi@...
Wechat: 89619780


On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:35 PM "Li, Xiang <x.li@...> wrote:
+1 (binding)

Re: Anyone know what this is?

Dan Kohn <dan@...>
 


The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
4381 - 4400 of 7317