|
apache foundation security
Camille Fournier
http://www.apache.org/security/ An example model for having foundation support for vulnerability management and mitigation
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: Slides for TOC Call: 5/11/16
alexis richardson
In particular, note that I linked to some slides on the "how CNCF adds value to projects" topic
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Sarah Saul via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Slides for TOC Call: 5/11/16
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
subscribe
Sengor Kusturica <sengork@...>
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Call tomorrow
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Elissa Murphy <elissam@...>
+1
Thx,
e
From: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM To: Sarah Saul <ssaul@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] VOTE "incubation principle" oh well in that case:
YES
now we are six.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Sarah Saul
<ssaul@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
alexis richardson
Matt, On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Matt T. Proud ⚔ <matt.proud@...> wrote:
Thanks.
We are still working on these things. FWIW, I don't think it will be possible to presuppose a single duration. I would hope we can avoid the antipattern where a project get stuck in perpetual incubation.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Matt T. Proud
This is sensible as a safety mechanism. I appreciate the consideration. Apologies if it has been defined elsewhere, but has a standard period/duration been prescribed for the incubation period, or is the promotion to be proposed on an ad hoc basis? Also: what is the notice period between proposal of promotion and its effectuation, if at all?
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:02 PM Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
alexis richardson
oh well in that case: YES now we are six.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Sarah Saul <ssaul@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
alexis richardson
Sarah Please could you summarise the votes to date. a
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Sarah Saul via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Brian Grant
YES
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Camille Fournier
+1
On May 6, 2016 7:05 AM, "Jonathan Boulle via cncf-toc" <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
+1
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
[RESULT] Prometheus accepted as a CNCF project
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
YES
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 3:10 PM To: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] VOTE "incubation principle"
Per our call this week, we wish to record support for the "incubation principle" via a vote on a formal statement.
alexis ----
FYI: Stemmed from the April 13th discussion: http://lists.cncf.io/pipermail/cncf-toc/2016-April/000131.html
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Benjamin Hindman
+1!
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
VOTE "incubation principle"
alexis richardson
TOC voters, Per our call this week, we wish to record support for the "incubation principle" via a vote on a formal statement. Please indicate your vote on when a project is promoted from Incubation by saying YES or NO. Today we are seeking unanimous support, from all TOC voting members, for the following statement. If this vote is passed then we shall record the principle in appropriate venues such as the CNCF development process (which is still being worked out). alexis ---- “1. The time when becoming a CNCF Project is irrevocable is when a project is promoted from Incubation 2. Prior to this a project may choose to leave, or be asked to leave. The TOC might change this rule in the future but for now it has a clear rationale: it enables new projects to have a safety valve. Before the TOC has finalised its modus operandi and how we help CNCF projects, we want projects to join CNCF and help us shape our model. So we are asking projects to join despite this uncertainty. In return we provide a safety valve.” ---- FYI: Stemmed from the April 13th discussion: http://lists.cncf.io/pipermail/cncf-toc/2016-April/000131.html
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: VOTE: Prometheus
alexis richardson
We have unanimity!
On Wed, 4 May 2016 23:44 Solomon Hykes via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote: Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Think before you print.