Re: TOC Agenda for 3/19/2018
oh... and by 3/19/2018 I meant 3/20/2018, the CNCF TOC meeting is tomorrow :)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
TOC Agenda for 3/19/2018
Here's the draft agenda deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/PpznT7 We'll be welcoming NATS (incubation) to CNCF, along with OPA/SPIFEE and sandbox projects, discussing sandbox guidelines v1.0, working group creation process, update on reference architecture and opening it up to the community for questions as I believe we have a light agenda compared to normal. Also Alexis sends his regrets. See everyone tomorrow! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Richard Hartmann
+1 non-binding
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Nikolay Pshenichnyy
+1 (non-binding)
Linkerd is an excellent service mesh proxy!
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
alexis richardson
thank-you for the detailed summary, George!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Georgi Khomeriki <g.khomeriki@...> wrote:
+1 (non binding)
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
g.khomeriki@...
+1 (non binding) Linkerd provides a mature and production-ready implementation of a service mesh. There are several areas where its architecture has considerable benefits over currently available alternatives. For example, linkerd's plugin-based architecture provides extensibility of the data plane that allows for much more customized integrations into pre-existing architectures compared to alternatives that allow customization via remote API contracts. Although the JVM overhead is a downside, there are many use-cases where linkerd is a great fit.
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Zack Angelo <zack.angelo@...>
+1 (non-binding)
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Dan Richelson
+1 (non-binding) Linkerd is legit with a great core team and supporting community!
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Ruben Orduz <ruben@...>
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io <chris=chrisshort.net@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
0 non-binding
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 21:02 Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> wrote:
--
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
-1 non-binding I think linkerd does a great job helping applications gain resilience from the network proxy and it has done an amazing 🙌 job and educating users and gaining production usage. I don't see linkerd as a product having as much traction going forward and have a hard time seeing more development diversity going forward. The resource requirements of it and the pattern of a hostcentric proxy have trade-offs that I don't think reinforce the other patterns and products the CNCF has promoted as cloud native.
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Brandon Dimcheff <brandon@...>
+1 non-binding
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:46 PM vongosling <fengjia10@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
vongosling
+1 (non binding) Also have a the same question, any plans to diversify that in the future ? I am glad to integrate linkerd with Apache RocketMQ 5.0 deeply :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Co-founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...>
+1 (non-binding)
|
|
Re: Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox
Thanks Eric, but let's please keep this discussion to the GitHub issue you already opened: To enter the sandbox, you will need to present to the TOC and find at least two TOC sponsors. I also advise you read the TOC principles on the types of projects we are looking for in CNCF: Since this project isn't even open source, it's hard to have a discussion but let's please keep the conversation on GitHub.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Greer, Eric <eric.greer@...> wrote: Hello everyone, --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox
Greer, Eric
Hello everyone,
I gave a presentation today at the Kubernetes community meeting about Kuberhealthy: https://youtu.be/tvP_HPFteKI?t=41 Kuberhealthy is a synthetic monitoring tool for Kubernetes clusters that has been developed internally at Comcast, but we really want to see it donated to the CNCF as a sandbox project. I have read the sandbox documentation agreed upon recently, but I would like to know what more I need to provide before this can be voted on. The source code for this is not currently available to the public because there are some contentions with the project name. I talked with Dan from the LF and he let me know that naming won't be an issue provided the rights are signed over to the CNCF. If we get a green light as a sandbox project, then I think it might be best to initially publish the code directly to a public repository owned by the CNCF. If we need the project to be open sourced prior to a vote, then I will need to go through the process of releasing it as a different name (and possibly re-branding all the code?) within the Comcast open source repository prior to again re-branding and moving within the CNCF. I'm happy for any recommendations from the CNCF on the best way to handle all this. Here is the link to the slides from the presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tL80i7VTBUlDs5KXy7TBZcHVX45lFST2cmmE3oyjYWc/edit?usp=sharing If I can or should provide any more information, please let me know. Thanks! Eric Greer
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
William Morgan
Thanks! And those are just the public ones. :) Re: code percentages. This is a side-effect of where the project started, but we definitely want to diversify and I expect that it will happen naturally over time. E.g. we've had a couple non-Buoyant folks who have done major bits of work over the past year (and we've been expanding the maintainers list to reflect that). -William
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)
NASSAUR, DOUGLAS C <dn283x@...>
Awesome work team. Great stuff.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Regards, Doug
On Mar 15, 2018, at 10:12 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
drbarker@...
+1 (non-binding)
Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669
From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:28 PM To: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
The linkerd team has requested a move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86
You can see the project statistics here:
https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/ and the linkerd project believes they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Have a healthy number of committers:
https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee. Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or by forwarding it to the NAIC Service Desk at help@....
|
|