Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
-1 non-binding I think linkerd does a great job helping applications gain resilience from the network proxy and it has done an amazing 🙌 job and educating users and gaining production usage. I don't see linkerd as a product having as much traction going forward and have a hard time seeing more development diversity going forward. The resource requirements of it and the pattern of a hostcentric proxy have trade-offs that I don't think reinforce the other patterns and products the CNCF has promoted as cloud native. |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Brandon Dimcheff <brandon@...>
+1 non-binding On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:46 PM vongosling <fengjia10@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
vongosling
+1 (non binding) Also have a the same question, any plans to diversify that in the future ? I am glad to integrate linkerd with Apache RocketMQ 5.0 deeply :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Co-founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...>
+1 (non-binding)
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox
Thanks Eric, but let's please keep this discussion to the GitHub issue you already opened: To enter the sandbox, you will need to present to the TOC and find at least two TOC sponsors. I also advise you read the TOC principles on the types of projects we are looking for in CNCF: Since this project isn't even open source, it's hard to have a discussion but let's please keep the conversation on GitHub. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Greer, Eric <eric.greer@...> wrote: Hello everyone, --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox
Greer, Eric
Hello everyone,
I gave a presentation today at the Kubernetes community meeting about Kuberhealthy: https://youtu.be/tvP_HPFteKI?t=41 Kuberhealthy is a synthetic monitoring tool for Kubernetes clusters that has been developed internally at Comcast, but we really want to see it donated to the CNCF as a sandbox project. I have read the sandbox documentation agreed upon recently, but I would like to know what more I need to provide before this can be voted on. The source code for this is not currently available to the public because there are some contentions with the project name. I talked with Dan from the LF and he let me know that naming won't be an issue provided the rights are signed over to the CNCF. If we get a green light as a sandbox project, then I think it might be best to initially publish the code directly to a public repository owned by the CNCF. If we need the project to be open sourced prior to a vote, then I will need to go through the process of releasing it as a different name (and possibly re-branding all the code?) within the Comcast open source repository prior to again re-branding and moving within the CNCF. I'm happy for any recommendations from the CNCF on the best way to handle all this. Here is the link to the slides from the presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tL80i7VTBUlDs5KXy7TBZcHVX45lFST2cmmE3oyjYWc/edit?usp=sharing If I can or should provide any more information, please let me know. Thanks! Eric Greer |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
William Morgan
Thanks! And those are just the public ones. :) Re: code percentages. This is a side-effect of where the project started, but we definitely want to diversify and I expect that it will happen naturally over time. E.g. we've had a couple non-Buoyant folks who have done major bits of work over the past year (and we've been expanding the maintainers list to reflect that). -William On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)
NASSAUR, DOUGLAS C <dn283x@...>
Awesome work team. Great stuff.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Regards, Doug
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
drbarker@...
+1 (non-binding)
Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669
From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:28 PM To: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
The linkerd team has requested a move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86
You can see the project statistics here:
https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/ and the linkerd project believes they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Have a healthy number of committers:
https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee. Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or by forwarding it to the NAIC Service Desk at help@.... |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
JJ
+1 (non binding) On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Quinton Hoole
+1 (non binding)
Impressive production adoption!
I notice that 95%+ of code is contributed by current Buoyant employees. Any plans to diversify that in the future? To be clear, this is not a pre-requisite for incubation.
Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@... ID#Q00403160
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 10:28 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
|
|||||
|
|||||
[VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
The linkerd team has requested a move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86 You can see the project statistics here: https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/ and the linkerd project believes they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md - Have a healthy number of committers: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/releases and https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd/graphs/contributors Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/86 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)
derek@...
Thanks to everyone and special thanks to Alexis for the sponsor. The team is excited! On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: congratulations NATS team! |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)
alexis richardson
congratulations NATS team!
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that NATS has been accepted into CNCF as |
|||||
|
|||||
[RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)
Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that NATS has been accepted into CNCF as an INCUBATION level project (sponsored by Alexis Richardson): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/81 - Alexis Richardson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1847 - Camille Fournier: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1874 - Solomon Hykes: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1882 - Jonathan Boulle: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1883 - Ken Owens: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1889 - Ben Hindman: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1890 - Brian Grant: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1891 +1 non-binding community votes: - Chris Short: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1844 - Ginger Collison: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1846 - Alex Chircop: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1848 - Jessica Frazelle: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1849 - Lee Calcote: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1850 - Christian Posta: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1851 - Eduardo Silva: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1852 - Michael Hausenblas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1853 - Derrick Kittler: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1854 - Quinton Hoole: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1855 - Michael Cwienczek: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1856 - Dustin Kirkland: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1857 - Andy Santosa: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1858 - Louis Fourie: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1859 - Patrick Chanezon: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1860 - Gou Rao: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1861 - JJ (Jeyappragash): https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1862 - Nick Chase: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1863 - Randy Abernethy: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1864 - Justin Cormack: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1865 - Mark Peek: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1869 - Justin Cappos: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1870 - Dino Dai Zovi: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1871 - Daniel Bryant: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1873 - Dan Wilson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1875 - Doug Davis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1878 - Duncan Johnston-Watt: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1884 - Haim Helman: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1887 - Richard Hartmann: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1888 We'll be working with the NATS community over the next few weeks to welcome them to the CNCF project family. Thanks again to everyone who voted and participated in the due diligence process: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/due-diligence-guidelines.md Finally, please welcome the NATS community! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] NATS project proposal (incubation)
Brian Grant
+1 binding On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:16 AM Benjamin Hindman <benh@...> wrote:
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] NATS project proposal (incubation)
Benjamin Hindman
+1 binding On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
--
Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
|
|||||
|
|||||
FW: [cncf-private-toc] REMINDER: project proposal vote for NATS
Owens, Ken <Ken.Owens@...>
+1 Binding
Ken Owens Vice President Digital Native Architecture
Mastercard 2200 Mastercard Blvd. | O'Fallon, MO 63368 mobile +1 636-542-0923
From:
cncf-private-toc@... [mailto:cncf-private-toc@...]
On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
The vote is live for NATS:
We currently have votes from 3 TOC members:
- Sam Lambert: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1845 - Alexis Richardson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1847 - Camille Fournier: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1874
It would be great for other TOC members to get their votes in by the end of this week.
Thank you.
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] NATS project proposal (incubation)
Richard Hartmann
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: [VOTE] NATS project proposal (incubation)
Haim Helman
+1 non-binding
|
|||||
|