|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Ihor Dvoretskyi
+1 non-binding
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
+1, non-binding
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Final RFC: CNCF Sandbox
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal vote next week: https://goo.gl/gZhBjY After the vote and assuming the sandbox is approved, we will resume voting on new project proposals (existing inception proposals will be slotted for the sandbox). Thanks. Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Doug Davis <dug@...>
+1 non-binding At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox) Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
alexis richardson
+1 binding
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, John Belamaric <jbelamaric@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
John Belamaric
+1 non-binding
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Eduardo Silva
+1 non-binding
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Lee Calcote <leecalcote@...> wrote:
--
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Richard Hartmann
+1 non-binding Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
On Feb 20, 2018 17:57, "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
Lee Calcote
+1 non-binding
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
|
|
|
[VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here: https://coredns.devstats.cncf.io and they meet the incubation criteria requirements: - Used successfully in production by at least three independent end users of sufficient scale and quality: seven listed in the ADOPTERS file, others may be discussed privately - Have a healthy number of committers: six maintainers from four different companies (Google, Infoblox, Apprenda, Independent). 71 contributors in the main repository - Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions: 12+ releases since joining CNCF, 489+ commits/merged PRs on the main repository since joining CNCF (81+ of those PRs are from authors other than Miek and Infoblox) Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full incubation proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/66 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
TOC Agenda 2/20/2018
Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless WG, Reference Arch v2.0 call to action and if there's time, a presentation from the rexray team. See everyone tomorrow! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Stephen Watt
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
data on OCI contributors
Rob Lalonde
Hey Chris.
You can ignore my Slack message. Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar? I see data for K8s and Helm. Thanks! Rob
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Doug Davis <dug@...>
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it! As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote:
thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog  "Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in additionFrom: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...> To: cncf-toc@... Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION Sent by: cncf-toc@... I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"! - Bryan On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier. Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call. alexis
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) >
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
alexis richardson
As a dog owner, I object to that.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <dug@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Doug Davis <dug@...>
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read. I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"! - Bryan On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier. Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call. alexis
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) >
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
alexis richardson
Hurrah
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, 10:24 Bryan Cantrill, <bryan@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop. Much, much better than "inception"! - Bryan
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Hi all
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
alexis richardson
Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io <yangguan=google.com@...> wrote: +1 (non-binding)
|
|
|
|
[VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
alexis richardson
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that Inception will be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier. Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and associated changes and clarifications. This will include much of the discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call. This draft is under active editing now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend voting on Inception projects. I apologise for any delays that are caused by this. For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC call. alexis On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io <yangguan=google.com@...> wrote: +1 (non-binding)
|
|
|
"Chris Aniszczyk" ---02/20/2018 08:57:36 AM---At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and reque
"alexis richardson" ---02/08/2018 07:44:37 AM---As a dog owner, I object to that. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Doug Davis <
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition
"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition