|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
alexis richardson
I'll email you & Lachlan off list.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
Quinton Hoole
I’m busy putting together a draft PR now, that we can iterate on. Any input will be graciously received and included.
Q
From: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 12:02 To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> Cc: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>, CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
alexis richardson
yes!
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
some of this is outlined here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#toc-contributors I'd welcome a proposal via PR to make it clearer
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
Lachlan Evenson
Perfect. Thanks. As it's my first pass at doing tech DD on a CNCF project I can document the process as I go and we can formalize that into a process. Is there value in a tech DD process?
From: Bassam Tabbara <bassam@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 11:30 AM To: Alexis Richardson Cc: Lachie Evenson; CNCF TOC Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence Also have a look at some of the open and closed PRs like:
Thanks!
Bassam
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
Quinton Hoole
Given how many volunteers we have to assist with technical due diligence exercises, I imagine the question of “what am I expected to do?” will come up increasingly frequently.
Should we perhaps preemptively put together a brief written set of guidelines as to how best to lead and/or contribute to a technical due diligence exercise?
Q
Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office # E2-9 Email: quinton.hoole@... ID#Q00403160
From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 11:30 To: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
just sign up here via comment: https://docs.google.com/a/linuxfoundation.org/spreadsheets/d/1kCko19aVmwbRMQdULJbGk4w2AxkjbBWuD6PUNzvQl7U/edit?usp=drive_web the NATS proposal should be out in a week or so where we will invite all TOC Contributors to comment on / provide due diligence
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
Bassam Tabbara <bassam@...>
Also have a look at some of the open and closed PRs like:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks! Bassam
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
alexis richardson
I don't think we have a DD process yet. If you want to help with nats i can show you what we have mostly been doing.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, 19:26 Lachie Evenson via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
TOC Contributors - Project tech due diligence
Lachlan Evenson
I would like to help contribute with project tech due diligence. Before I dig in I wanted to ask if there is an established process that I can apply?
Looking here -- https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
Cheers,
Lachie
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Running NATS in K8s
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Regarding cross-cloud, the project is here: https://github.com/cncf/cross-cloud/ and I will make intros as NATS goes forward. Echoing your previous points, a lot of what the cross-cloud team spends time on is the continuous deployment packaging of projects into a chart, so if NATS moves forward on that work it will dramatically simplify what cross-cloud needs to do. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io +1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Bob Wise via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Running NATS in K8s
Bob Wise
Peter, Thank you. I would advocate for building a chart for deployment on Kubernetes in the short run and an operator (much bigger job) over time. I would advise that your team should consider the chart as first-class maintained artifact as an important step for the core NATS server as well. My team (Samsung CNCT) have done a lot of work around charts, and happy to offer some advice/assistance. I can connect you with our charts lead (Matt Farina) who is also one of the Kubernetes SIG Apps leads. Noting that the pires project referenced below appears to be tested against 1.5.x. That's getting pretty old in Kubernetes releases. If you are interested in nats-on-kubernetes CI (which I think you should be), I can also offer assistance via one of our other team members - Aaron Crickenberger. CNCF also has a growing cross project CI effort that we would recommend you get involved in. Chris - do we have a normal first point of contact for those interested in this? Offer is open to anyone on the candidate project lists needing some opinionated guidance. -Bob Wise
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Peter Miron via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Running NATS in K8s
Peter Miron <peter.miron@...>
As requested on today's call. Core NATS server on Kubernetes (with custom route generator): https://github.com/pires/kubernetes-nats-clusterNATS Streaming with NFS (Helm Chart): Also, a quick note on NATS Streaming, we do have file-locked based fault tolerance today, as configured in the above example. This relies on you having trusted, replicated storage vs. the NATS server handling redundancy. If anyone has suggestions for how to more easily configure with some of the more recent container storage specs and possibly replica sets, let us know. Happy to hear ideas. Thanks! Pete
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: [VOTE] Notary/TUF project proposal (incubation)
Mark Peek
+1
Mark
From:
<cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
The TOC has decided to invite Notary (https://github.com/docker/notary) and the TUF (https://github.com/theupdateframework) as an incubation level CNCF project, sponsored by Solomon Hykes from the TOC:
The Update Framework (TUF) is a specification designed to solve specifically provenance and trust problems as part of a larger distribution framework. Notary is a content signing framework implementing the TUF specification in the Go language. The project provides both a client, and a pair of server applications to host signed metadata and perform limited online signing functions.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/38
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Face to face TOC meeting at Cloud Native Con / Kubecon?
Ihor Dvoretskyi
That's the best of my free slots, so +1.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: [VOTE] Notary/TUF project proposal (incubation)
Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...>
+1 (non binding) 2017-10-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Sam Lambert via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>:
--
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Face to face TOC meeting at Cloud Native Con / Kubecon?
alexis richardson
Would 6pm Monday work well for people?
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Face to face TOC meeting at Cloud Native Con / Kubecon?
Brian Grant
I could make the following times work:
I'm going to be involved in the dev summit all day Tuesday and probably in a number of the SIG meetings (and certainly the one I lead), so other times will not work.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: [VOTE] Notary/TUF project proposal (incubation)
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
+1
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Ken Owens via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Re: Face to face TOC meeting at Cloud Native Con / Kubecon?
Stephen Watt
+1. I just wanted to add that other interested constituents in attending would be the various participating work group members. A lot of the work group work is still at a formative phase and having some face time goes a long a way to avoiding misinterpreted intentions when it comes time for the intense debates!
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Dan Kohn via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|||
|
|
|||
