Re: prior docs about vitess


Sugu Sougoumarane
 

Vitess offers different transaction modes and isolation levels as described here: http://vitess.io/user-guide/twopc.html#isolation.

The choice depends on what an application can tolerate. In case of the current Vitess community, users have rarely requested 2pc. They are usually satisfied with single-shard ACID transactions. The few that have requested 2PC are satisfied with the default isolation trade-offs.

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel
evolutions of each category X.  If so then we can ask what properties
of X are preserved.  Atomicity and durability only?

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
> Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition
> from MySQL to a more scalable implementation (scalable enough for Youtube),
> without taking so big a leap as NoSQL. Sugu confirmed that Vitess is getting
> interest from MySQL users.
>
> I could imagine also trying to find projects covering other categories, such
> as object storage and some flavor(s) of NoSQL.
>
> I view filesystems as a different category than these application-level
> storage systems.
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc
> <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
>>
>> The main doc:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7gqlpQNJpZtsolHeX6vXR4NXXwGrCMsCz8rSi5jsBA/edit#heading=h.d6b07oufwoag
>>
>> The original presentation a few weeks ago:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hvTin7ui_p_klCM9F88vBoFU_5K4Ax6KlnYIZR5jAgs/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136
>> _______________________________________________
>> cncf-toc mailing list
>> cncf-toc@...
>> https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
>
>

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.