Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Seems like there is interest to learn about Moby beyond the TOC
Saw your TheCUBE interview and Moby does make sense, sort of the Linux and RedHat/Fedora model if I got it right
The things that need interpretation are:
in the Linux/Fedora model many of the components come from the community and have open governance and not owned by RedHat, they just test and package based on project maturity and customer demand, its unlikely to see successful (non RedHat) Linux projects that don’t make it to of the Fedora and RedHat package
Moby seems very focused on Docker Inc components, e.g. would you support a commercial package that take your best parts with say Kubernetes or other CNCF projects.
Another concern is how do we create more collaboration on the open-source/common parts (like Linux) and less fragmentation with overlapping vendor specific projects that don’t have open governance models or common abstractions/interchangeability
From: cncf-toc-bounces@... [mailto:cncf-toc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Solomon Hykes via cncf-toc
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 1:12 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in particular.
Several people from the CNCF community have asked questions about it, and how it relates to CNCF. I thought it might be useful to allocate time on the TOC call to take questions.
What do you think?