Re: Vitess follow up


Sugu Sougoumarane
 

Hi Chris, Alexis,

For the license, we already intend to change it to ALv2: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2694.

For the comparison of various systems and trade-offs, we'll try to put something together in the next few days.

As for why we're excited about wanting to join CNCF, I think this issue describes it well: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2670.

PS: Thanks for the adopters suggestion on github. I'll work on that, and also see if we can feature them on vitess.io.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Also in terms of process, I believe Brian Grant on today's call has expressed interest in sponsoring the project from the TOC. I'd suggest at a following or next TOC meeting to decide whether the TOC desires to formally invite the project.

Another thing to bring up is that Vitess is currently under the BSD-3 license (https://github.com/youtube/vitess/blob/master/LICENSE), which isn't a major issue, but we will have to decide what approach to take (move to ALv2 or go for an exception) if they become a project.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Sugu

Thank you again for your pres today.

What would *help Vitess the most* from a project advancement & end user POV?  How can CNCF help?

a



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.