Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, September 13


Davanum Srinivas
 

A bit more color on Kubescape request.

- Can someone run the service in a local k8s cluster (without any link to SaaS services provided by ARMO)
- Can the CLI talk to the service in the local cluster by default (without needing to require accessing the SaaS services?)
- The SaaS product is also named Kubescape? ( https://cloud.armosec.io/account/login?redirectUrl=%2Fdashboard ), Can the product and the open source project be separated? (named differently)

Also please see the recording when it becomes available, as we were scratching our heads quite a bit.

thanks,
Dims


On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 2:01 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
The TOC met today to review applications at sandbox.cncf.io.

The following projects were included into the sandbox:

Serverless Devs - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC
ContainerSSH - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC
OpenFGA - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC
Kured - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC
Carvel - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC
Lima - Passes with a majority vote of the TOC

Not included:
Unikraft 
 -  Already a Linux Foundation project, we do not yet have a way to share projects between foundations, but there is an open issue to do so! https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/889
Kubescape
 - TOC requests that the project decouple Saas from the open source project, both in naming and functionality


Recording will be made available on the CNCF TOC YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB

Our next sandbox review meeting will be November 22nd, 2022.

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs, CNCF | amye@...



--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.