Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Matt Young #6936 We have been thinking about this in TAG Observability as well, and have work in flight that’s related: * Form Program: Annual Sandbox Review [1] * Create summary slides [2] [1] https://github.com/cncf/tag-observability/issues/80 [2] https://github.com/cncf/tag-observability/issues/83 Will have details Tuesday as part of TAG update. Matt toggle quoted messageShow quoted text On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 9:41 AM Josh Gavant <joshgavant@...> wrote: [Edited Message Follows] +1 to pushing more to TAGs. Perhaps each proposed project can be assigned to a TAG and a member of the TAG can lead a technical review and guide the project's leads on criteria for acceptance. That could help TOC reviews go more smoothly, make them more likely to succeed, and ensure projects and contributors don't get lost or feel unsupported along the journey. It could also give first-time CNCF/TAG contributors an idea of where to start - they could pick an open project for the TAG and review and present it to the group. As a start in this direction a couple months ago I created a label in TAG App Delivery to track project review requests from TOC: https://github.com/cncf/tag-app-delivery/issues?q=label%3Atoc-review
More All Messages By This Member

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.