SIG Observability: Accusations during OpenTelemetry Incubation Recommendations
I am cc-ing TOC, SIG Observability, Alolita, Constance, Priyanka, Richi and Chris for transparency.
During the last SIG Observability call on 2021-03-16, when I was recommending against the OpenTelemetry incubation, it was stated that I had “conflict of interest”, “bias”, “subjective opinion” and “rude behavior”.
To be clear, I am not offended. I just want to find a positive resolution and finish my work. At this point, I don’t know how and I’m asking for help. I would like to ask for an outside review of all my actions, documents and calls as the Tech Lead SIG Observability, doing Due Diligence for the OpenTelemetry. My honest belief is that I performed the assessment thoroughly and objectively to my best ability. I looked at all aspects of OpenTelemetry in the context of the CNCF Principles and Incubation requirements. I did an investigation and interviewed developers and users and listened to the advantages of OpenTelemetry.
These accusations should be proven or disproven. I would love to improve my work if I did it wrong. I would love the feedback.
We can discuss my assessment on the technical level, but last SIG Observability calls were less about the technical aspect, more about attempts to adjust Tech Lead opinion, make it sound softer, mask it (e.g put it out of the DD document), or even disregard completely from the TOC eyes due to accusations. I am not a decision-maker, I would be happy with any decision CNCF will make in the end. I only want my assessment to be registered as I take my duties as the Tech Lead seriously.
Relevant SIG Observability calls:
I would greatly appreciate your feedback.
Bartek Plotka, SIG Observability Tech Lead