Re: Istio Steering Committee
alexis richardson
Thanks for all those thoughts Matt and for reviewing the steering
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
committee proposal and GH issue https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/459. I'm going to topline you here for brevity but LMK if you would like a detailed response on any point. At this point, I am just really keen to hear from teams and associated ISVs like Nats & Synadia, Linkerd & Buoyant, Crossplane & Upbound, etc. Ultimately my motivation in helping CNCF get started, putting in time on the TOC and our Principles, is to get to a place where users benefit from a family of projects that are truly sustainable and useful, and where innovation is based on a fair and level playing field for many different ways to make projects succeed. I'm worried that we've lost sight of some of the "ends", eg good projects, and are becoming fixed on "means", eg how maintainers are employed. Let's hear more from people on the challenges they are seeing here. The SC model is really intended as ONE way to help. I like it because it promotes participation from non-coding roles alongside coding maintainers, and focuses on healthy outcomes.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:54 AM Matt Wilson <msw@...> wrote:
|
|