Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Bob Wise (AWS)

-1 non-binding.


I’m deeply concerned about the idea that CNCF is accepting what appears to be a Kubernetes fork into sandbox.


The statements about “encouraging upstream” seem like good intentions only.


Kubernetes as a project has, in my opinion, succeeded in part because of the community dedication to staying upstream and not forking.


For clarity, I would be strongly in favor of k3s being part of Kubernetes upstream.







From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Alena Prokharchyk via" <>
Reply-To: "aprokharchyk@..." <aprokharchyk@...>
Date: Friday, July 31, 2020 at 9:09 AM
To: Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.


+1 binding.



On Jul 31, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:


k3s has applied for inclusion into the sandbox:

Liz Rice has called for the vote:

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!



Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...


Join { to automatically receive all group messages.