1. Messages
  2. [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews

Alex Chircop
 

Agreed - makes sense.   We should also merge the new sandbox proposal process into main workflow doc too: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc

Thanks,
Alex

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Lee Calcote via lists.cncf.io <leecalcote=gmail.com@...>
Sent: 09 July 2020 12:31
To: michelle.noorali@... <michelle.noorali@...>
Cc: Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io <liz=lizrice.com@...>; cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>; liz@... <liz@...>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
 
+1 NB. Sound logic here. 

- Lee

On Jul 9, 2020, at 4:42 AM, Michelle Noorali via lists.cncf.io <michelle.noorali=microsoft.com@...> wrote:


+1
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io <liz=lizrice.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 4:58 AM
To: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
 
Now that we have the new Sandbox application process running, it might make sense to make similar tweaks to the Sandbox annual review process too. Specifically I'd like to suggest: 

* Moving from three sponsors to a simple TOC majority vote
* A regular cadence to review & vote on these, so that projects know when they can expect to get feedback

Wdyt? 
Liz 

 
Join {cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.