Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews

Alex Chircop

Agreed - makes sense.   We should also merge the new sandbox proposal process into main workflow doc too:


From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Lee Calcote via <>
Sent: 09 July 2020 12:31
To: michelle.noorali@... <michelle.noorali@...>
Cc: Liz Rice via <>; cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>; liz@... <liz@...>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
+1 NB. Sound logic here. 

- Lee

On Jul 9, 2020, at 4:42 AM, Michelle Noorali via <> wrote:


From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Liz Rice via <>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 4:58 AM
To: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
Now that we have the new Sandbox application process running, it might make sense to make similar tweaks to the Sandbox annual review process too. Specifically I'd like to suggest: 

* Moving from three sponsors to a simple TOC majority vote
* A regular cadence to review & vote on these, so that projects know when they can expect to get feedback



Join { to automatically receive all group messages.