1. Messages
  2. Incubation public comment period

Re: Incubation public comment period

Vinod
 

Hi Chris,


Not all DD reviews and discussions are open and public. The communications are happening in the private channels, this has been confirmed by the TOC in the meetings.


I believe this proposal is related to my comments on the Contour submission, about the decision to go to the TOC vote without public comment ( https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/330#issuecomment-626820824 ), the particular submission was a bit out of normal from the beginning itself.


I think reducing the time for public comment will result in less transparency. The transparency is one of the main issues in the TOC survey ( https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gTTf6USC0wDOCbwd5goS7e4qjGO8nqiPQO4fl_D3OuQ/edit#slide=id.g71ebafc016_0_237 )


There are many other submissions which are waiting longer than the Contour, it would be appreciated if the proposal would improve the experience for all, not just a few.


Thanks,


Vinod


On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:13 PM Kris Nova <kris.nova@...> wrote:
Strong agree with alexis - I’m booked solid these days and unless something is on fire it usually gets bumped down the list.

I usually book at a minimum one week out from initial engagement and I believe that’s fairly common in the industry. So setting aside time for myself for something like this would require 7+ days to even get it on my calendar to review.

—
Kris Nova
Chief Open Source Advocate


> On 15 May 2020, at 09:38, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
>



Join {cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.