Re: Contour to CNCF sandbox
Joe Beda <jbeda@...>
Two corrections here:
1) contour is looking at incubation and will be working through the sig.
2) the question here is about how we are utilizing sigs for projects that already have sponsors. We've had discussions on where we are headed here and I personally didn't remember where we landed for sandbox projects with TOC support already.
I would expect that this would be applied evenly to all projects without special treatment for contour.
If ambassador is looking to join at the sandbox level let's have this discussion.
From: Gerred Dillon <hello@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 4:30:10 PM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: Joe Beda <jbeda@...>; Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>; CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Contour to CNCF sandbox
What are the status of other Envoy-based projects in this space? With Contour asking to skip the SIG process established a few months ago for sandbox - notably recommended by those who are part of this thread - others are being asked to attain, do other ingress projects such as Ambassador have the opportunity to join the sandbox in the same way, or will they need to be part of SIG Network due diligence before becoming a topic for the TOC?
If this group is establishing rules that benefit the larger community and foundation, they should apply to everyone - no matter who proposes it for inclusion, or who tries to skip existing protocol set forth for other projects over the holidays.
On Jan 7, 2020, at 6:12 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote: