Re: CNCF Governance Proposal

Alex Baretto

Thanks, I will incorporate these therein.

On Sep 21, 2016 8:55 PM, "Alexis Richardson" <alexis@...> wrote:

All discussion on this matter was in the doc, so you didn't miss
anything.  Please DO feel free to suggest edits in the doc.  That
would be great.


On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Alex Baretto via cncf-toc
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've been reviewing the recent Graduation Proposal on behalf of Huawei. I
> have recently joined the TOC meetings so I may have missed some of the
> earlier discussions.
> I have the following questions:
> - I wanted some clarity on the styling of the graduation evaluation
> criteria. OSS project possess their idiosyncrasies, and whilst the proposal
> puts forward good ideas to capture these, the terminology may not clarify
> them sufficiently, as under the present proposal.
> - It may be good to consider inclusion of more explicit language regarding
>   -- "multiple end users" - we may want to specify whether this is more then
> 2 users or more than 3 users, etc.
>   -- "committers from more than one organization..." - we may want to
> specify that this means having committers from more than two organizations
>   -- "no longer can be recommended" - do we have detailed criteria in mind
> for non-recommendation? ASF?
>   -- "no longer represents best practices in its area" - similarly, do we
> have detailed criteria in mind?
> Thank you.
> Alexandre Baretto
> axbaretto@...
> _______________________________________________
> cncf-toc mailing list
> cncf-toc@...

Join to automatically receive all group messages.