Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving

alexis richardson

+1 binding

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, 18:15 Igor Mameshin, <igor@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jon Mittelhauser <jon.mittelhauser@...> wrote:

+1 NB


From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 10:03 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving


+1 binding


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.


Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here:


This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project:


- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)


Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.



Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Join to automatically receive all group messages.