Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving


Chris Short
 

+1 NB but CoreOS still had the best logos

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 11:50 via Lists.Cncf.Io <jbeda=vmware.com@...> wrote:

+1 binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rkt archiving

 

Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.

 

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262

 

This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md

 

- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
- CNCF will list archived projects online
- Trademarks and domain names of archived projects are still hosted neutrally by the CNCF and the Linux Foundation
- CNCF can provide services such as documentation updates to help transition users.
- Other CNCF marketing activities will no longer be provided for the project (like space at conferences)

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Chris Short
He/Him/They

Join {cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.