Re: CNCF SIG (and WG) expected deliverables
toggle quoted message Show quoted text
The SAFE WG was an independent group (as I always understood it) that was NOT under the auspices of the CNCF or the CNCF TOC until very recently. Over those last 10 months, there's been much debate around "Categories and SIGs" and what they should deliver and that was finalized early this year. SAFE then morphed into SIG-Security a few months ago.
So you're essentially saying, "I asked for something as a CNCF TOC member from a group that wasn't a CNCF sanctioned working group and they gave me nothing." While it would have been in the best interest of the SAFE WG to produce something, they weren't required to by any means. If I am wrong about the relationship between SAFE and the CNCF prior to them becoming SIG-Security, please correct me.
Now that being said, I do feel like the SIG-Security group should be producing white papers and the like. Specifically I'd like to see:
- White paper of practical implementation advice
- Cloud Native Security Landscape (This was something at SAFE had started)
- Cloud Native Security Trail Map
This is not an exhaustive list as it doesn't included some of the Policy white papers Sarah is interested in producing.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:27 PM Quinton Hoole <quinton@...> wrote: