Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS Project Proposal
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I agree with Camille -- while an admirable start (and a good name), CoreDNS is just too new and too small: the project itself was only conceived of in March, and by any metric (GH issues, contributors, commits, followers, stars, releases, social media mentions) it remains nascent. So I would say the answer to CoreDNS is not so much "no" as "not yet".
More generally, I would like each proposal to answer two (additional) questions: "What do we bring to the CNCF?" and "What would we like the CNCF to bring to us?" I feel that the CNCF projects under incubation have clear answers to these questions -- but it is much less clear for me in the case of CoreDNS...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Camille Fournier via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote: