Re: CNCF SIG "App Delivery"

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

alexis richardson #3371 Jeff I think the intent is already pretty broad, including app templates and so on (eg Helm), plus various pieces of the CD pipe, plus supporting dev tools. IMO stuff like PaaS & serverless is out of scope. Does this make sense? a toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:07 PM Brewer, Jeff <Jeff_Brewer@...> wrote: Would it make sense to have a more general app sig? I'd be curious what other CNCF TOC members think. I know in general Kubernetes has tried to stay unopinionated "up the stack" but it seems unless we define an "application" in a more formal way, having App Delivery as a SIG is premature. Am I making sense? Jeff On 6/4/19, 9:04 AM, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of alexis richardson" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of alexis@...> wrote: This email is from an external sender. Michelle and I are pulling together a SIG for App Delivery. Our next step: draft a charter. We'd love a few keen would-be SIGonauts to join our chartering efforts, please! Also, we shall figure out a plan to solicit leaders for the group. Interested? Email us offline. Alexis+Michelle
More All Messages By This Member

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.