Re: CNCF SIG "App Delivery"

alexis richardson


I think the intent is already pretty broad, including app templates
and so on (eg Helm), plus various pieces of the CD pipe, plus
supporting dev tools.

IMO stuff like PaaS & serverless is out of scope.

Does this make sense?


On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:07 PM Brewer, Jeff <Jeff_Brewer@...> wrote:

Would it make sense to have a more general app sig? I'd be curious what other CNCF TOC members think. I know in general Kubernetes has tried to stay unopinionated "up the stack" but it seems unless we define an "application" in a more formal way, having App Delivery as a SIG is premature. Am I making sense?


´╗┐On 6/4/19, 9:04 AM, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of alexis richardson" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of alexis@...> wrote:

This email is from an external sender.

Michelle and I are pulling together a SIG for App Delivery.

Our next step: draft a charter. We'd love a few keen would-be
SIGonauts to join our chartering efforts, please! Also, we shall
figure out a plan to solicit leaders for the group.

Interested? Email us offline.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.