Re: [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal


Sarah Allen
 

+1 non-binding -- thanks everyone for all of your hard work on defining this!

Note: I submitted a PR that transforms the original PR into a steady-state process, rather than a proposal, since after the vote it will no longer be a proposal.  Not sure what the process is for that kind of administrative editing.  I'm 100% behind the idea of SIGs and what was defined in original proposal, just wanted to point this out, so it doesn't get lost in transition, if y'all find it helpful.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:43 AM Ken Owens <kenchristineowens@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:22 AM Sandeep Shilawat <shilawat@...> wrote:
+ 1 

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:45 PM "Li, Xiang <x.li@...> wrote:
+1 binding

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.