Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation

Rakshith Venkatesh

A question out of curiosity here. Shouldn't the movement of projects across various stages in CNCF be based on how many of the end user community and customers have adopted and how the product is behaving in prod?

Thanks and Regards,

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 7:02 PM, Ihor Dvoretskyi <ihor.dvoretskyi@...> wrote:
+1 (non-binding). 

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 3:30 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
OPA has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:

Since entering the CNCF Sandbox, OPA has demonstrated growth and progress. 12 releases were published with 480 commits from 41 individuals. Approximately 75% of the commits came from Styra, 7% Chef, 5% Cisco, and 13% others. In January 2019, Styra, Google, Microsoft, and others began jointly developing and contributing the OPA Gatekeeper sub-project. Gatekeeper integrates OPA with Kubernetes to help admins enforce admission control policies and audit clusters for existing policy violations.

Also since joining the CNCF, OPA has formalized a governance policy and undergone an external security audit:
The OPA community believes it has fulfilled all the incubation criteria:

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here:

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.