On Mar 20, 2019, at 3:21 AM, Brendan Burns via Lists.Cncf.Io <bburns=microsoft.com@...> wrote:

+1 binding

---

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 11:13 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal

 

+1 binding

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, this is the formal vote for the CNCF SIGs proposal. 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mt1LH1QJgwA91A6x-DEdjg4ZOXrOnxxc1d2xhq4Hq3I/edit

There has been a long discussion on restructuring how WGs work in CNCF to help scale the community. A CNCF SIG will oversee and coordinate the interests pertaining to a logical area of needs of end users and/or projects.  Examples of such areas include security, testing, observability, storage, networking. The area overseen by a SIG is typically met by a set of CNCF projects, and may also represent a cross-cutting feature group shared by several projects (like security and observability).

A special thank you to Alexis, Quinton and many others who provided input. We will bootstrap the notion of CNCF SIGs starting with the governance/security one that has served as a pilot for this work initially and go on from there.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

-- 

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719