1. posterid:556940
  2. [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal

Re: [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal

Quinton Hoole
 

+1 (no longer binding) :-)

Q

From: cncf-toc@... [cncf-toc@...] on behalf of Michelle Noorali via Lists.Cncf.Io [michelle.noorali=microsoft.com@...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 9:24 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk; eboyd@...
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal

+1 binding
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Erin Boyd via Lists.Cncf.Io <eboyd=redhat.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 11:33 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk
Cc: cncf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal
 
+100 (non-binding)

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:47 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, this is the formal vote for the CNCF SIGs proposal. 


There has been a long discussion on restructuring how WGs work in CNCF to help scale the community. A CNCF SIG will oversee and coordinate the interests pertaining to a logical area of needs of end users and/or projects.  Examples of such areas include security, testing, observability, storage, networking. The area overseen by a SIG is typically met by a set of CNCF projects, and may also represent a cross-cutting feature group shared by several projects (like security and observability).

A special thank you to Alexis, Quinton and many others who provided input. We will bootstrap the notion of CNCF SIGs starting with the governance/security one that has served as a pilot for this work initially and go on from there.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Join {cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.