+1 binding

 

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, 02:55 Doug Davis, <dug@...> wrote:

Aside from the typo [1], +1 non-binding


[1] https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194/files#r255297017


thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog

<>"Chris Aniszczyk" ---03/18/2019 09:47:59 PM---Hey all, this is the formal vote for the CNCF SIGs proposal. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/ur

From: "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...>
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date: 03/18/2019 09:47 PM
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal
Sent by: cncf-toc@...

---

Hey all, this is the formal vote for the CNCF SIGs proposal. 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mt1LH1QJgwA91A6x-DEdjg4ZOXrOnxxc1d2xhq4Hq3I/edit

There has been a long discussion on restructuring how WGs work in CNCF to help scale the community. A CNCF SIG will oversee and coordinate the interests pertaining to a logical area of needs of end users and/or projects.  Examples of such areas include security, testing, observability, storage, networking. The area overseen by a SIG is typically met by a set of CNCF projects, and may also represent a cross-cutting feature group shared by several projects (like security and observability).

A special thank you to Alexis, Quinton and many others who provided input. We will bootstrap the notion of CNCF SIGs starting with the governance/security one that has served as a pilot for this work initially and go on from there.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719