Re: [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal


Ruben Orduz <orduzr@...>
 

+1 non-binding 


On Mar 18, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Davanum Srinivas via Lists.Cncf.Io <davanum=gmail.com@...> wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:17 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey all, this is the formal vote for the CNCF SIGs proposal. 


There has been a long discussion on restructuring how WGs work in CNCF to help scale the community. A CNCF SIG will oversee and coordinate the interests pertaining to a logical area of needs of end users and/or projects.  Examples of such areas include security, testing, observability, storage, networking. The area overseen by a SIG is typically met by a set of CNCF projects, and may also represent a cross-cutting feature group shared by several projects (like security and observability).

A special thank you to Alexis, Quinton and many others who provided input. We will bootstrap the notion of CNCF SIGs starting with the governance/security one that has served as a pilot for this work initially and go on from there.

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.