Re: Anyone know what this is?


Russell Bryant <rbryant@...>
 

Thanks, Chris!  That channel just got archived on slack, unfortunately.  We are in #cluster-api as well, though. 

we can set up a mailing list for metalkube too if that helps. 

Russell Bryant

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 1:24 PM Chris Wright <chrisw@...> wrote:
That's great Xuan!  I agree, Kube is very promising for a variety of edge and other usecases in the network.

Jump on #wg-onprem in Kubernetes Slack, visit http://metalkube.org/, or ping Russell (Cc'd) if you need any other pointers.

thanks,
-chris

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019, 2:45 AM Xuan Jia <jason.jiaxuan@...> wrote:
Hi Chris, i am very interested in this project.  It may have some value in edge computing. 
We are finding if community have any solution to solve the bare metal machine management problem .
MetalKube is the one.  How can we do together ? 

From my point of view, the resource in Edge Computing Data Center is limited.   CNF is a very good chose in Edge. 

Xuan Jia
Edge Computing Architect 
China Mobile Research Institute 

Chris Wright <chrisw@...> 于2019年3月2日周六 上午12:01写道:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 2:37 PM Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:
The statement about competing with openstack is especially unfortunate.

I agree, I'm very disappointed by that statement.

And all solutions have noisy neighbor challenges. It's workload dependent.

Indeed. Similarly all solutions have security challenges. And then pointing to microvms as interesting after describing Kata as FUD is minimally confusing and maximally reads as just bad mouthing another project.

Having said the above, that's mostly about messaging concerns. I do see real value in Kubernetes on bare metal for a number of usecases including network functions.

So I'm curious to see who is interested in Kubernetes on bare metal?  For those interested, we're working on a project called metalkube: 


Feel free to jump on slack and learn what's going on there.

thanks,
-chris



On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 10:09 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
If so then I assume this article is all a set of misquotes by the journalist:




On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, 15:58 Dan Kohn, <dan@...> wrote:
Definitely, there's a lot more to come. We're also hoping to get a bunch of telcos and their vendors engaged and making improvement to the Testbed so that it becomes a real, collaborative open source project.

--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:49 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
Fwiw I think this is pretty cool, but I suspect a lot of parties interested in this comparison would also want to see latency & jitter info added to slide 9. Is that in the pipeline Dan?

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:18, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:

The code: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:13 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

--
Liz Rice
@lizrice  | lizrice.com+44 (0) 780 126 1145
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation  https://www.cncf.io
+1-415-233-1000  https://www.dankohn.com

--
Russell Bryant

Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.