Re: Improvement Feedback on KubeCon/CloudNativeCon NA 2018
Ruben Orduz <ruben@...>
To be clear, in full agreement with need for track chairs. That will help with the review aspect for sure. But there's also the proposal side that needs improvement. Without incorporating a few key changes, no matter the efficacy of the reviewers and track chairs if they don't have enough evidence to review on, it will still be a lot about gut feeling, who-you-know, renown and biases involved. These will always exist, we're humans after all, but an aim of the program committee should be to minimize these or at least to be able to reasonably defend why proposal A and not proposal B or C was selected. Best, Ruben
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM Geri Jennings <geri.jennings@...> wrote: I like the track idea, and I would propose a track specifically for developers working for vendors building tools in the cloud-native ecosystem and their particular concerns around developing stable, secure, and reliable products in this environment.
|
|