Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Wilson, Dan <dan.wilson01@...>
As an end user I stopped submitting talks after a few conferences in a row not getting selected so I suspect there are just so many submissions it’s easy to get drowned out.
I like the idea of capping submissions to increase the value of what is submitted but I’m not sure that would help. Is there real data that could determine if would or not? Do we have submission counts vs selection counts by company or some such figure which could be used for modeling out a good limit? Even then how could you determine if the result would actually be something better?
The only other option is probably to let the internet vote for it and we all know that’s a terrible idea :)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io" <briangrant=google.com@...>
Please remember that "vendors" are also in many cases the primary contributors to CNCF projects.
I talked to one of the co-chairs. There are vastly more talks submitted by project contributors than by end users. Perhaps that should be an ask to our end-user community -- submit more talks.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:59 PM Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...> wrote: