Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I agree with Alena that single blind may make the most sense for Kubecon. Academic venues that use double blind usually do so (in part) to try to cut down on nepotism, etc. The acknowledged loss is that sometimes knowing who the presenter is can add information about the value of the work.
I do think that single blind probably makes more sense in this case, because I'm presuming that it isn't that PC members from vendor A are accepting all vendor A talks. (In academic conferences, this would be a conflict regardless so people at the same institution cannot review each others' submissions.)
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:36 PM Alena Prokharchyk <alena@...> wrote: