"Quinton Hoole" <quinton.hoole@...> wrote: > I also think that it would be super-useful for submission rejection > notices to be accompanied by a few brief reviewer notes (e.g. “too > much marketing pitch”, “not open source”, “previously presented”, > “duplicated submission”, “off topic" etc) to help submitters to > improve their chances in future (and perhaps also clarify any
Big +1 > possible misperceptions by reviewers, as the submissions are by > necessity brief). As just one illustrative data point, all 10 of my > submissions to KubeCon China and US were rejected, and none of the > rejections seem explainable by any of the “how to improve the odds” > guidelines. So I have no idea what to do differently in future.
