Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Doug Davis <dug@...>

"Quinton Hoole" <quinton.hoole@...> wrote:
> I also think that it would be super-useful for submission rejection
> notices to be accompanied by a few brief reviewer notes (e.g. “too
> much marketing pitch”, “not open source”, “previously presented”,
> “duplicated submission”, “off topic" etc) to help submitters to
> improve their chances in future (and perhaps also clarify any

Big +1

> possible misperceptions by reviewers, as the submissions are by
> necessity brief). As just one illustrative data point, all 10 of my
> submissions to KubeCon China and US were rejected, and none of the
> rejections seem explainable by any of the “how to improve the odds”
> guidelines.  So I have no idea what to do differently in future.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.