1. Messages
  2. RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Robert Roeser <robert@...>
 

 

Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? 

The project hasn’t sought active contributors until now.

 

What did the "language agnostic" point mean? 

RSocket is spec’d protocol (https://github.com/rsocket/rsocket/blob/master/Protocol.md), and not dependent on a language features for implementation. Right now, there are implementations in Java, Javascript, C++, and Kotlin. There is interest in Python and Golang implementation, and plans to implement these.

 

 

From: Brian Grant <briangrant@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 9:24 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>, Robert Roeser <robert@...>, "bhale@..." <bhale@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

 

Thanks for the presentation.

 

It looks like the project has existed for about 3 years? Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? Development looks not very active and it has < 300 github stars.

 

 

What did the "language agnostic" point mean? Just that it has implementations in multiple languages (at least Java and C++ -- it's not clear which other languages are actively maintained/developed)?

 

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:04 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

 

I just wanted to move this discussion to the mailing list as there was some questions that weren't answered and I know that Colin had some feedback on the project comparisons (rsocket vs nats vs grpc)

 

Also Alexis Richardson from the TOC is OK to sponsor this effort into the Sandbox, so if anyone else is interested in sponsoring, please let me know.

 

Feel free to continue the discussion here.

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Join cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io to automatically receive all group messages.