When we performed the k8s apps survey we listed the tools we were aware of at the time (incomplete but a list) and did a cut line based on some measure of popularity (often github stars for projects there). It’s imperfect but provided a reason for the ones listed. We then included space for people to list other tools. Would it make sense for the CNCF to follow a similar method? Though, I’m unsure of the best way to handle commercial products but a reasoned common cut line would provide a reason, in general, we could debate.
