Re: RexRay follow up
Mueller, Garrett <Garrett.Mueller@...>
If I’m taking your meaning correctly, co-evolution (where there are two independent projects that rely on each other) is precisely the situation I was arguing against.
If we do this right, I think there should be three things. CSI itself, orchestrator implementations of CSI, and CSI storage plugins. Each of those three things already co-evolve somewhat independently. Many of us are already working on all three.
A project that helps people write CSI things shouldn’t be a 4th thing, in my opinion. It should be something the CSI community creates and evolves together based directly on the spec that it’s writing.
Technical Director @ NetApp
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson <alexis@...>
Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2018 2:57:24 AM
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] RexRay follow up
If rexray and CSI benefit from "co evolution" then that might make sense. Is that the case? What does the community think?
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, 05:05 Bassam Tabbara, <bassam@...> wrote: