Re: RexRay follow up
Thanks Dan, I think having spec and implementation(s) in the same foundation make sense.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In this case, Rex-Ray is not an implementation. If I understood it correctly, its a a set of tools, packaging, and libraries that aid in writing CSI plugins. So it feels a bit different.
It almost like saying there is OpenTracing, OpenTracing-Packaging-and-Tools, and Jaeger as three separate projects.
I think it would make more sense to make Rex-Ray part of CSI if the two communities are open to that.